News   Sep 17, 2019
 20     0 
News   Sep 17, 2019
 13     0 
News   Sep 16, 2019
 178     0 

Urban Development and Proposals Discussion

BKha

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
597
Reaction score
258
5 years ago when I worked at Saltlik, Most of the restaurant patrons were suburbanites or tourists, but mostly suburbanites. I'm not saying Stephen Ave needs to cater to cars, but suburbanites contribute significantly to the after hours business at those restaurants. what's the harm in leaving it as it is? or at least have one lane open. @darwink idea of one lane is a good compromise. It opens the mall up to more opportunity for pedestrians and who knows, maybe even bike lane, while still allowing taxis to come through. My own observation is more taxis than private cars use the mall, and there is a fair bit of taxi traffic dropping and picking up from the restaurants. As for having spots for cars to park, it's not needed IMO.

Might be controversial to say this, but we shouldn't care whether people who drive to Stephen Avenue are accommodated or not. To be honest, they are not the market for night time activity, and make up a ridiculously small percentage of the people who use the street. Same thing with 17th avenue. Let's stop trying to accommodate a bunch of suburbanites who complain about not being able to park or whatever, and actually focus on the people who are more likely to patronize this area (hipsters and yuppies who live downtown, or use taxis or ubers to get to those destinations). Sometimes I feel like our strategy for urbanism in this city is akin to Axe Body Spray trying to figure out how to tap the 70+ year old market. Or Saje trying to figure out how to get teenage males into essential oils. Maybe you are looking at the wrong market.
 

Calgcouver

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
232
Reaction score
512
Curious on what peoples opinions on adding low and mid-rise residential above existing buildings on Stephen Avenue (ie. redoing the Sport Chek or Winners) in a fashion similar to this link:

I think that adding a considerable amount of residential above Stephen Ave with modernized zone similar to Vancouver's HA-1, HA-1A, & HA-2 zone;
that impose significant design and material constraints to encourage redevelopment similar to Gastown, would Stephen Ave a very interesting loft-style historic centre in Calgary. It is one thing to focus on improving the public infrastructure, but the uses are still a lot of garbage retailers and office uses above. It would be nice to see buildings like the Winners building be redeveloped, to have retail that is demised to smaller sizes, and to incorporate residential uses only above grade.

I think that it would be beneficial to rein-vision 8 Ave as a residential and retail core of the downtown on current heritage sites. Just improving the public infrastructure is just lipstick.
 
Last edited:

CBBarnett

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
457
Reaction score
895
First Street SW from 9th and 6th would make a really nice candidate for a traffic-limited zone. There's only three buildings on that whole stretch built in the past century (Brookfield Place, Len Werry,, and that ugly one across from the Palliser). This stretch would also have the benefit of being bookended by two sizeable plazas and include significant historic structures; the aforementioned Palliser, Grain Exchange, Lougheed Block.

Not that I'm necessarily saying cut traffic on First, but honestly I think it could really do with an addition of 50% or more to the width of sidewalks.
The data supports what you are feeling about 1st Street SW, it's incredibly pedestrian-heavy. I pulled the 2018 cordon count and looked at the total inbound/outbound trips and active modes - all the regular data limitations of cordon counts apply obviously, but it's the best we have.

1st Street SW has the highest active modes corridor as a percentage of total trips (50.6%) and the second highest overall pedestrian total (8,421) and highest pedestrian mode share (40.2%) of any cordon that had all modes present (e.g. the Peace Bridge excluded as active modes makes 100% of trips on it).

By Total Active % of Trips Counted (of cordons with all modes present)
Cordon LocationSum of Transit %Sum of Peds %Sum of Cycle %Total Active (Transit + Peds + Cycle)
1 St SW North of 10 Av
7.9%​
40.2%​
2.4%​
50.6%​
Centre St Bridge Upper Deck
44.9%​
2.7%​
0.6%​
48.2%​
8 St SW North of 10 Av
16.4%​
30.1%​
1.6%​
48.0%​
5 St SW North of 10 Av
10.1%​
27.9%​
8.8%​
46.8%​
4 St SW North of 10 Av
15.7%​
28.6%​
0.6%​
44.9%​
9 Av SE East of 7 St
31.1%​
1.8%​
1.2%​
34.0%​
11 St SW North of 10 Av
0.8%​
25.1%​
3.9%​
29.8%​
Langevin Bridge (4 St NE)
8.4%​
13.1%​
2.6%​
24.1%​
Louise Bridge
14.7%​
6.6%​
0.5%​
21.8%​
1 St SE North of 10 Av
6.4%​
8.2%​
0.3%​
14.9%​
4 St SE North of 10 Av
1.1%​
9.3%​
3.4%​
13.8%​
Macleod Tr SE North of 10 Av
3.5%​
6.6%​
0.3%​
10.4%​
9 Av SW West of 11 St
5.9%​
0.6%​
0.2%​
6.7%​

By Total Active Trips Counted (of cordons of all modes present)
Row LabelsSum of Transit TotalSum of Peds TotalSum of Cycle TotalTotal
Centre St Bridge Upper Deck 22,650 1,349 317 24,316
8 St SW North of 10 Av 4,816 8,845 474 14,135
1 St SW North of 10 Av 1,652 8,421 506 10,579
5 St SW North of 10 Av 2,233 6,160 1,942 10,335
9 Av SE East of 7 St 8,485 482 314 9,281
4 St SW North of 10 Av 2,880 5,236 112 8,228
Louise Bridge 3,901 1,734 143 5,778
1 St SE North of 10 Av 2,431 3,112 128 5,671
Langevin Bridge (4 St NE) 1,844 2,871 577 5,292
11 St SW North of 10 Av 114 3,403 534 4,051
Macleod Tr SE North of 10 Av 968 1,838 89 2,895
6 Av SW West of 11 St 2,859 27 7 2,893
9 Av SW West of 11 St 2,499 255 91 2,845
5 Av Flyover 2,534 4 7 2,545
4 St SE North of 10 Av 149 1,203 441 1,793
 
Last edited:

googspecial

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
143
Reaction score
349
First Street SW from 9th and 6th would make a really nice candidate for a traffic-limited zone. There's only three buildings on that whole stretch built in the past century (Brookfield Place, Len Werry,, and that ugly one across from the Palliser). This stretch would also have the benefit of being bookended by two sizeable plazas and include significant historic structures; the aforementioned Palliser, Grain Exchange, Lougheed Block.

Not that I'm necessarily saying cut traffic on First, but honestly I think it could really do with an addition of 50% or more to the width of sidewalks.
Man, the sidewalks need redone between 7 & 9 Aves so bad. This side is particularly embarrassing.
 

UrbanWarrior

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 28, 2016
Messages
2,545
Reaction score
4,317
Location
Capitol Hill

Surrealplaces

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 24, 2015
Messages
6,356
Reaction score
12,402
Location
Calgary
Wow that looks amazing. Hitting that up today for sure!
A really underrated part of Calgary IMO. I think that in general Calgary's Bow River pathway system is underrated. It seems like tourists are often the ones who notice it the most. That said, the city has done a decent job of upgrading and improving it. The stretch from Louise Bridge to East village has come a long way in the past 10 years.
 

Mountain Man

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 9, 2017
Messages
1,287
Reaction score
1,090
Apparently we are approaching 1.6M according to that article lol. I do question whether all our infrastructure runs on renewable power though, that seems like a stretch.
 

Habanero

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
338
Reaction score
245
Location
Calgary
Even if we were to simply include Foothills MD today, we would be pretty close to 1.6M.
As of 2018 Calgary estimated CMA population was 1,486,050 and adding Foothills would be about another 80K, so today in 2019 we should easily be at 1.6 million people. It's one of the rare times an article actually got the population right.
 

Habanero

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
338
Reaction score
245
Location
Calgary
Even if we were to simply include Foothills MD today, we would be pretty close to 1.6M.
As of 2018 Calgary estimated CMA population was 1,486,050 and adding Foothills would be about another 80K, so today in 2019 we should easily be at 1.6 million people. It's one of the rare times an article actually got the population right.
 
Top