News   Oct 18, 2019
 111     0 
News   Oct 18, 2019
 68     0 
News   Oct 17, 2019
 273     0 

Urban Development and Proposals Discussion

Patrick.1980

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
309
Reaction score
306
Melborne looks great but Copenhagen, Moscow, and San Francisco makes me dread a repeat of what happened to Devonian Gardens. An aging but lush and interesting space turned into sterile 2010s mall planters, cold walkways, contemporary structures that won't age well, etc. Just an overall cold feel. At least for the moment, there are some classical components such as the columns by HBC and the old fashioned lamp posts etc. that are more timeless.

The structures and styling from those Moscow Riverfront and San Francisco pictures might look okay but you have to remember that Calgary's Century Gardens and other brutalist public spaces also looked very modern and exciting in the 60s/70s.
I was thinking the same thing, and the Melbourne one was already good to begin with, they didn't really do anything. I don't find the other visions or completed projects that great to be honest.
 

darwink

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 7, 2016
Messages
1,073
Reaction score
1,377
The number 1 thing Stephen Ave needs is to ban traffic 24-7.
Why? Is it an obstacle? We could make the street taxi/rideshare/delivery vehicles only. Plus it would make the mental barrier for extending an impoved streetscape westward that much higher, with parkades and hotels being accessed from 8th.
 

CBBarnett

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
472
Reaction score
956
Exciting news for Stephen Ave - even if actual development is years away.

What I would love to try: a car-free/car-lite, pedestrian-oriented street East-West or North-South into the Beltline and on a street with much more a residential flavour, it would give the local debate more ammunition of what could/should be in our street designs. I would be stoked for a conversion of a side street on any of the low traffic, high pedestrian roads (15th, 14th, 13th Ave + Centre, 2nd, 6th, 7th, 9th, 10th, 12th Streets) to reflect their current reality, let alone their future one of fewer and fewer cars. There will always be some, sure, but there is no future in which these roads will ever require more car space than they already have. Over 50% of people along these streets report using active modes to get around already and their is no regional argument for capacity that applies on the local roads.

Ideal scenario: 1 east-west pedestrian-only / pedestrian-mostly street (i.e. Stephen Ave) and one north-south pedestrian-only / pedestrian-mostly street connecting to the Beltline where people actually live at density (as opposed to another 3rd Street SW scenario). If it's too radical to take the whole thing of a north-south access, take half: imagine a high-quality 2 lane wide cycle-track, pedestrian priority street along the east side of 5th Street from 17th Ave to Stephen? That would be immensely popular and well used.

A few design considerations any new pedestrian street should have:
  • Signal priority, particularly against car-sewer roads (9th, 10th, 11th, 12th Avenues)
  • Raised crosswalks so no grade change for pedestrians or cyclists from one end to the other at all
  • Trees that survive and are set up for success with better bio-swales and planters
  • Sidewalk travelling areas that are 2 - 4X wider than currently, but consistent for the full length
  • Benches
 

Mountain Man

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 9, 2017
Messages
1,322
Reaction score
1,157
Why? Is it an obstacle? We could make the street taxi/rideshare/delivery vehicles only. Plus it would make the mental barrier for extending an impoved streetscape westward that much higher, with parkades and hotels being accessed from 8th.
It's not an obstacle, it just takes away from the potential of the street in my opinion. Any improvement they are going to do will be minor unless there can be permanent changes in the street area (art installations, a fountain for summertime, things like that...). The downside to banning cars is for people trying to find parking, the one ways and traffic ban on 7th mean large circles to get back to where you were.
 

ByeByeBaby

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
34
Reaction score
121
Location
403/YYC/T2R
Why? Is it an obstacle? We could make the street taxi/rideshare/delivery vehicles only. Plus it would make the mental barrier for extending an impoved streetscape westward that much higher, with parkades and hotels being accessed from 8th.
It's a massive obstacle.

For one thing, it makes any large-scale improvements (benches, fountains, planters, picnic tables,...) impossible because the entire middle of the street needs to be open and clear. It also makes temporary installations impractical -- beakerhead is a great example -- because everything needs to be cleared by 6 PM. During the busiest hour of Beakerhead, people are starting to take down anything that might be in the vehicle right-of-way. So it's an obstacle to all kinds of activity.

I roughly measured a cross-section (by The Unicorn) yesterday. To my (approximate) count, Stephen Ave was 62 feet wide. The road lane is 14 feet wide and the parking lane 10 feet. So that's 24/62 = 38% of the gross space. But that's a huge understatement. The first thing is that there is a substantial "furniture zone" on either side of the roadway that is filled with light posts, benches, garbage cans and the like. It's important stuff, but basically makes about 3 feet on either side of the road useless for walking down the street. Then there are the patios (and pseudo-patios like Earl's extension). The Unicorn's patio is 12 feet wide. Patios are great, and they contribute to the feel of Stephen Avenue, and I'd increase rather than decrease them. But on a section with two twelve foot patios and the three foot furniture strip on either side of the roadway, there's only 32 feet left. When the road is open, it takes 24/32 = 75% of the useful space. And the remaining space is a narrow 4 foot strip, which is too narrow for wider pedestrians to pass each other (e.g. strollers, a couple holding hands, a wheelchair user).

And the vehicle traffic is already mostly taxi/TNC already, which is silly when there's a taxi stand basically on every single cross-street. (If I were in charge, I'd add taxi stands in the parking on the east side of 3rd St and in part of the Glenbow loading dock just to make every cross street have taxi coverage.) We're blocking 3/4 of the useful width of the street so that people don't have to walk less than half a block to get their cab or ride (and to park less than 20 cars per block). Vehicle traffic is a huge obstacle.
 

Mull

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Messages
53
Reaction score
49
Does anyone know how to filter on the Calgary Development Map to see all active ("i.e. not approved or refused") permits? I think it used to be like this but when they updated the site, it defaults to all histroical permits, or, you can select only one option from the filter list. i.e. right now it appears to be showing 1 or all
 

JonnyCanuck

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 15, 2017
Messages
581
Reaction score
706
It's not an obstacle, it just takes away from the potential of the street in my opinion. Any improvement they are going to do will be minor unless there can be permanent changes in the street area (art installations, a fountain for summertime, things like that...). The downside to banning cars is for people trying to find parking, the one ways and traffic ban on 7th mean large circles to get back to where you were.
I agree. As long as vehicular traffic/parking is allowed, there is limited potential. The core of 8th Ave is from Macleod Trail to 3 St SW. I would like to see that section be pedestrian only. It is now during the day, Mon-Fri, and sometimes on weekends. Why not make it permanent? That would free up considerable space to really be imaginative.
 

darwink

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 7, 2016
Messages
1,073
Reaction score
1,377
I agree. As long as vehicular traffic/parking is allowed, there is limited potential. The core of 8th Ave is from Macleod Trail to 3 St SW. I would like to see that section be pedestrian only. It is now during the day, Mon-Fri, and sometimes on weekends. Why not make it permanent? That would free up considerable space to really be imaginative.
I am worried that would kill it retail wise - the illusion of parking being available is a powerful thing. Don't want to turn it into a fancy Sparks Street.
 

Cowtown

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
778
Reaction score
713
As one of the people here old enough to remember the days when there were no cars, I prefer the way it is now. The problem in the past was after hours, Stephen Ave was a dead zone. The cars after hours keep the restaurants and thus the mall, active.
 

Top