News   Sep 16, 2019
 90     0 
News   Sep 16, 2019
 53     0 
News   Sep 13, 2019
 156     0 

Urban Development and Proposals Discussion

haltcatchfire

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
636
Reaction score
1,066
They need those bollards that rise out of the ground like they have at the White House vehicle gates that would be able to be opened remotely by emergency vehicles.

Was amazing to see how fast those came up after police went through. If you were following behind your vehicle would be destroyed.

https://goo.gl/maps/R4VTYGyEnEQxuqie8
 

CCF

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 29, 2018
Messages
57
Reaction score
82
Not sure if mentioned - there's a sign up on a lot in West Eau Claire for another Graywood development.

edit: nevermind, I see it mentioned a few pages back.
 

MichaelS

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 5, 2016
Messages
783
Reaction score
1,576
So the recent updates on Hub at Banff Trail got me looking more closely at that area. I see that there is an approved DP (from 2017) for an office building further north in the TOD area, at 2020 Crowchild Trail NW:

I noticed the other week that the site had been cleared, it was just a surface lot and I am not sure how far north the clearing went. Here it is in Streetview, prior to clearing:

When you check the City's "My Property" map, you can see a building permit has been applied for back in April, BP2019-04408, so that would seem to indicate (along with the cleared site) that they intend to move forward.

The applicant for the DP is Farmor Architecture. While I couldn't find a write-up to go with this rendering, I am pretty sure this is what is proposed/approved for the site:
199192

Image from the architect's website:
 

ByeByeBaby

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
33
Reaction score
118
Location
403/YYC/T2R
As one of the people here old enough to remember the days when there were no cars, I prefer the way it is now. The problem in the past was after hours, Stephen Ave was a dead zone. The cars after hours keep the restaurants and thus the mall, active.
Surely you remember then that when Stephen Ave had no cars there were a lot fewer people living within walking distance; in 1966 the 6 census tracts that include part of downtown or the Beltline had 26,640 residents; the most recent civic census is 52,741. Not to mention the societal trends that have shifted over this time; a lot more people who walk, a lot more people who dine out. In 1996, about 36,000 people walked or biked into the downtown per day; now it's 87,000. And the total number of people going downtown without a car has gone from 153,000 to 312,000.

I've been walking on part of Stephen Ave for almost 20 years, and back then it was definitely a lot quieter than it is today. Maybe it's because there's twenty vehicles allowed to park per block, or maybe -- just maybe -- it's the hundred and fifty thousand more people downtown without a car. Having seen more than twenty people on a block, I tend to think it's the latter.
 

JonnyCanuck

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 15, 2017
Messages
556
Reaction score
662
Looks like Trico is moving forward with this. There will be 5 buildings in total with the first 3 buildings completed by summer of 2021. These will be purpose rental and the project is named Kingsland, for now.
Driving past this location I noticed construction is well underway now. Perhaps we should have project thread for this. The official project name is Kingsland Junction.
 

Cowtown

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
768
Reaction score
680
Surely you remember then that when Stephen Ave had no cars there were a lot fewer people living within walking distance; in 1966 the 6 census tracts that include part of downtown or the Beltline had 26,640 residents; the most recent civic census is 52,741. Not to mention the societal trends that have shifted over this time; a lot more people who walk, a lot more people who dine out. In 1996, about 36,000 people walked or biked into the downtown per day; now it's 87,000. And the total number of people going downtown without a car has gone from 153,000 to 312,000.

I've been walking on part of Stephen Ave for almost 20 years, and back then it was definitely a lot quieter than it is today. Maybe it's because there's twenty vehicles allowed to park per block, or maybe -- just maybe -- it's the hundred and fifty thousand more people downtown without a car. Having seen more than twenty people on a block, I tend to think it's the latter.
I don't remember back to 1966, I wasn't quite born yet, and if I was I',m not sure my memory would be good enough to remember. I was thinking more around the late 80's before vehicle traffic was allowed through. I always remember Stephen Ave as bustling during the day, but being terrible after hours.

Part of the renaissance is due to increased population, and lifestyle changes but I remember that the resto boom along Stephen Ave happened right after it was opened to traffic, it happened almost overnight. I firmly believe opening it to traffic was needed to get the businesses going after hours. Is it needed now? Maybe not, but does it hurt having it open to traffic? I think we still need it to be a bit busier before closing off vehicles.
 

CBBarnett

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
457
Reaction score
894
I don't remember back to 1966, I wasn't quite born yet, and if I was I',m not sure my memory would be good enough to remember. I was thinking more around the late 80's before vehicle traffic was allowed through. I always remember Stephen Ave as bustling during the day, but being terrible after hours.

Part of the renaissance is due to increased population, and lifestyle changes but I remember that the resto boom along Stephen Ave happened right after it was opened to traffic, it happened almost overnight. I firmly believe opening it to traffic was needed to get the businesses going after hours. Is it needed now? Maybe not, but does it hurt having it open to traffic? I think we still need it to be a bit busier before closing off vehicles.
It would be nice if we applied this logic the other way - most retail streets in the city centre are less reliant on personal vehicles than they ever have been (although they are still important in some places of course). We should be scrapping back a lane or two from most corridors to support the expanded residents, pedestrian, scooters and cyclists.

This discussion around Stephen Ave is missing the point - car-free or car-lite street will probably be successful on Stephen if designed properly given the growth in residents and pedestrians in the area. But that's business as usual, that's what we have already. The real opportunity is on all the other streets that are terrible pedestrian experiences, are seeing the same growth in residents and pedestrians but are stuck with terrible, incoherent and complete car-centric urban design.
 

Mountain Man

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 9, 2017
Messages
1,287
Reaction score
1,089
Downtown has reached a point where Stephen Ave would survive as a purely pedestrian mall, you can't even come close to parking on Stephen Ave already, unless you get there right at 6, and it's still not guaranteed lol.

Either way, I'm super curious what they come up with, the road doesn't seem outdated or anything to me, just in need of some TLC. Most urban designs the city has come up with in recent years have been fairly well done, lets see if they can keep that going. This is Calgary's most important street, better not screw it up lol.
 

JonnyCanuck

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 15, 2017
Messages
556
Reaction score
662
That section of Stephen Ave, Macleod Tr to 3rd St SW, has the highest concentration of heritage buildings in the city. Unfortunately, there are few other streets in downtown that can be replicated as a pedestrian experience. Virtually everywhere else are blocks of sterile office buildings, a few courtyards and uninteresting storefronts. It would be pointless to waste a lot of time and money trying to create an experience in other parts of downtown.
Whether vehicular traffic continues down 8th Ave, I think will depend on the final design recommendations for both Olympic Plaza and Stephen Ave. I betting it will be more pedestrian focused and less vehicular.

p.s When we talk about cars on Stephen Ave, we seem to forget the LRT line runs parallel, only one block north. The city should also be focused on increasing ridership, after business hours, in conjunction with the 21st century makeover experience.
 

darwink

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 7, 2016
Messages
1,056
Reaction score
1,321
Downtown has reached a point where Stephen Ave would survive as a purely pedestrian mall, you can't even come close to parking on Stephen Ave already, unless you get there right at 6, and it's still not guaranteed lol.

Either way, I'm super curious what they come up with, the road doesn't seem outdated or anything to me, just in need of some TLC. Most urban designs the city has come up with in recent years have been fairly well done, lets see if they can keep that going. This is Calgary's most important street, better not screw it up lol.
Removing parking, just having a few ride share/taxi lay-bys could get it down to one lane plus bike lanes for the most part.
 

retrofiturbanism

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Messages
122
Reaction score
228
Might be controversial to say this, but we shouldn't care whether people who drive to Stephen Avenue are accommodated or not. To be honest, they are not the market for night time activity, and make up a ridiculously small percentage of the people who use the street. Same thing with 17th avenue. Let's stop trying to accommodate a bunch of suburbanites who complain about not being able to park or whatever, and actually focus on the people who are more likely to patronize this area (hipsters and yuppies who live downtown, or use taxis or ubers to get to those destinations). Sometimes I feel like our strategy for urbanism in this city is akin to Axe Body Spray trying to figure out how to tap the 70+ year old market. Or Saje trying to figure out how to get teenage males into essential oils. Maybe you are looking at the wrong market.
 

UrbanWarrior

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 28, 2016
Messages
2,545
Reaction score
4,317
Location
Capitol Hill
That section of Stephen Ave, Macleod Tr to 3rd St SW, has the highest concentration of heritage buildings in the city. Unfortunately, there are few other streets in downtown that can be replicated as a pedestrian experience. Virtually everywhere else are blocks of sterile office buildings, a few courtyards and uninteresting storefronts. It would be pointless to waste a lot of time and money trying to create an experience in other parts of downtown.
Whether vehicular traffic continues down 8th Ave, I think will depend on the final design recommendations for both Olympic Plaza and Stephen Ave. I betting it will be more pedestrian focused and less vehicular.

p.s When we talk about cars on Stephen Ave, we seem to forget the LRT line runs parallel, only one block north. The city should also be focused on increasing ridership, after business hours, in conjunction with the 21st century makeover experience.
First Street SW from 9th and 6th would make a really nice candidate for a traffic-limited zone. There's only three buildings on that whole stretch built in the past century (Brookfield Place, Len Werry,, and that ugly one across from the Palliser). This stretch would also have the benefit of being bookended by two sizeable plazas and include significant historic structures; the aforementioned Palliser, Grain Exchange, Lougheed Block.

Not that I'm necessarily saying cut traffic on First, but honestly I think it could really do with an addition of 50% or more to the width of sidewalks.
 
Top