CalgaryTiger
Senior Member
Jeez, that seems ambitious! And I'm an NDP voter.The NDP just announced a commitment to fund the north leg of the Green Line up to 160 Ave N as part of their electoral promise
Jeez, that seems ambitious! And I'm an NDP voter.The NDP just announced a commitment to fund the north leg of the Green Line up to 160 Ave N as part of their electoral promise
Well they have now identified that the site for the North Calgary/Airdrie hospital won’t be equidistant between the two communities, but indeed in North Calgary so might as well stop saying it’s an Airdrie hospital. I wonder if it’s on that large site north of Stoney Trail off of Centre Street identified in the Livingston NSP? Would make sense given the Green Line is right there.The tweet I saw says $1.2B spending on Calgary but split over a number of areas and for the Green Line primarily just for land acquisition.
Yeah, most likely that piece of land in Livingston, that was what Brookfield reserved it for. It isn't too far from Airdrie, 15-20 minutes by car and probably less with the improvements they want to make to Airdrie-Calgary road connections.Well they have now identified that the site for the North Calgary/Airdrie hospital won’t be equidistant between the two communities, but indeed in North Calgary so might as well stop saying it’s an Airdrie hospital. I wonder if it’s on that large site north of Stoney Trail off of Centre Street identified in the Livingston NSP? Would make sense given the Green Line is right there.
Probably will be closer/faster for Airdrie residents than is the PLH.Yeah, most likely that piece of land in Livingston, that was what Brookfield reserved it for. It isn't too far from Airdrie, 15-20 minutes by car and probably less with the improvements they want to make to Airdrie-Calgary road connections.
Well they have now identified that the site for the North Calgary/Airdrie hospital won’t be equidistant between the two communities, but indeed in North Calgary so might as well stop saying it’s an Airdrie hospital. I wonder if it’s on that large site north of Stoney Trail off of Centre Street identified in the Livingston NSP? Would make sense given the Green Line is right there.
It'll be cool when this is done but let's not kid ourselves here - Greenline to 160 Avenue is many decades away. Further, any north hospital here is repeating the mistakes of the South Health Centre - it's facility sprawl.Here is the map including the institutional site where the hospital would likely be:
View attachment 476627
That commercial area, Aurora Business Park, is really the only area with the available space. But the City of Calgary has lofty mixed development plans for it and hasn't been keen on giving up its land there for other purposes, it didn't consider it for the maintenance yard for the Green Line for example.96 Ave also has better crosstown transit opportunities to other destinations like the commercial area around Harvest Hills T&T
Yet, except for the small retail/office area immediately adjacent to 96 Ave, the rest of the land remains undeveloped with no imminent construction.That commercial area, Aurora Business Park, is really the only area with the available space. But the City of Calgary has lofty mixed development plans for it and hasn't been keen on giving up its land there for other purposes, it didn't consider it for the maintenance yard for the Green Line for example.
I've noticed that too. I think that the delays to the Green Line has really affected its development, LRT was supposed to be an important part of it (even when it was coming from the Nose Creek direction) and now they have no idea what to do. They haven't even bothered to update the area structure plan from 2008.Yet, except for the small retail/office area immediately adjacent to 96 Ave, the rest of the land remains undeveloped with no imminent construction.
The research all suggests that "the price" is not fixed. Bad procurements practice, design etc. drives costs up but, it's not a given: https://transitcosts.com/$1billion is steep, but that’s the price of projects these days. In 15 years it’ll feel like a bargain.
Alright, then no point in discussing because we don't agree on the fundamental premise.And this is beside the point; if it was free, it wouldn't be worth connecting the red and blue lines to the green.