ByeByeBaby
Active Member
It's a great graphic. It could also do a great job of illustrating why Alberta HSR is not a particularly strong project:
Alberta is neat, since Alberta is a straight line, so the cities generate way more traffic between them than if they were in a grid. From 2021:It could also do a great job of illustrating why Alberta HSR is not a particularly strong project
There is some in the economic reports the province did in the late 2000s.
The main thing to visualize is most of the USA is in a grid. So urban-urban trips are generated in all directions between all centres.
4 cities in a grid, 1 million each. Think of each arrow as 4,000 trips each day, each direction.
View attachment 338235
In Alberta due to our relative isolation from other centres, our relative prosperity for a long time (running what may have been close to the densest air service on the planet in the 70s between the cores of each city, building a 4 lane highway decades before it was 'needed' to speed up travel significantly), and the development of specialization over time we have much stronger links.
Even if only 70% of trips are now taken due to a variety of factors, we have this instead:
View attachment 338240
It might still be, though - it's not that different on a passengers per km basis than the Maçon-Marseille stretch. I'm sure there's a lot less in the way, as well. (Although our material and labour costs are still huge).It could also do a great job of illustrating why Alberta HSR is not a particularly strong project
It's a great graphic. It could also do a great job of illustrating why Alberta HSR is not a particularly strong project:
View attachment 608654