Mountain Man
Senior Member
Hope you're right!
If the procurement fails entirely, which is still possible but way less likely now that there are two short listed firms, the VE and more importantly risk reduction step was to switch to elevated.Maybe this is just my desire to get this thing going but VE the stations and whatever else as much as you want on the first phase. Go minimalist and simple, save the fancy bits for the refresh in 2050. Just when you get to building over the bow downtown, do something special. But then get back to VE'd everything. Just build it.
Value engineering and Valley Line West and Southeast, Edmonton's new LRT lineWhat is “VE”, “VLW” and “VLSE” (for us common folk not in “the biz”)?
The obvious VE that nobody ever wanted to consider is going back to BRT design for the short-mid term, which has another huge benefit of being able to open in smaller chunks. At this rate they could pave a BRT and barely be ready to actually lay tracks when it is due for re-paving.Maybe this is just my desire to get this thing going but VE the stations and whatever else as much as you want on the first phase. Go minimalist and simple, save the fancy bits for the refresh in 2050. Just when you get to building over the bow downtown, do something special. But then get back to VE'd everything. Just build it.
But the only real possible extension at such a point, given the uncertainty of whether Stage 1 even crosses the Bow, is for it to continue further south. A bitter pill for NC Calgary to swallow given how the NC LRT was essentially cut in Stage 1.I think we're gonna see at least one extension break ground before stage 1 opens similar to VLW already well underway before VLSE has opened
Not ROW.It is kind of funny the argument to go with the SE first back around 2019 was that the ROW was already in place. If since the project was announced, the ROW for NC was acquired from then to now, the NCLRT would probably be ready to go, and it would rightfully be going up north first instead, with the garage over by Aurora Park.
Is that why costs to even 64th seem to be pretty pricy than considering the ease of how it looks externally? It feels like the estimates to go that far, should be to get it to about 96th or North Pointe instead.Not ROW.
Design. Centre Street has proven to be a much harder nut to crack than they expected before utility line surveys and geotech.
Not ROW.
Design. Centre Street has proven to be a much harder nut to crack than they expected before utility line surveys and geotech.
Is that why costs to even 64th seem to be pretty pricy than considering the ease of how it looks externally? It feels like the estimates to go that far, should be to get it to about 96th or North Pointe instead.
I get the frustration, but keep in mind that Calgary built their first LRT line a full 40 years before Ottawa, and Calgary was a significantly smaller city at the time. Rail system projects go in phases for different cities at different times, and cities tend to leapfrog each other because of that. I totally agree, this project should have moved along much faster, but when it's finished Calgary will leapfrog Ottawa. Someday later on Ottawa might end up leapfrogging Calgary, and so on.Holy Christ is this thing ever delayed. So the “design development phase” won’t even be done til 2024? What a joke. I was always the biggest proponent of this project, but holy shit. Ottawa - a city smaller than us with a smaller tax base - has built an entire LRT system since this was proposed, and already has the 2nd phase under construction, including an airport link. By 2025 their system will be just over 5 km longer than ours (65 km) and same number of stations, having only been built in 15 years essentially. Not to mention fully grade-separated. Ridiculous.