Good figures, but I think it is fair to say it hasn't been followed. Planning has likely not lost 30 staff, unless you count the staff that have moved over to "Urban Strategy", the new department created for Rollin Stanley when he was removed from the GM of Planning role. I don't see that group in the budget documents. Same with the relatively new business unit of Calgary Approvals Coordination.This is from the approved 4 year budget, so may not have been followed exactly.
A thousand. The growth came and will come from:
Corporate Administration: 35
Corporate Services: 72
Civic partners: -2
Community Services and Protective Services (ex. Bylaw, Fire): 352
Utilities and Environment: 194
View attachment 123910
Page 1014- 1015 of http://www.calgary.ca/_layouts/cocis/DirectDownload.aspx?target=http://www.calgary.ca/cfod/finance/Documents/Action-Plan/Approved/Action-Plan-2015-2018-Complete-Approved.pdf&noredirect=1&sf=1
7% FTE growth while the population grew from 1,120,225 --> 1,246,337 (11.3%) and the number of dwellings grew from 459,339 --> 506,392 (10.2%).
Seems reasonable to me.
Is it just me, or is this election gone way overboard in contentiousness? I don't recall an election like this before. I wonder how of that is due to social media?
Probably right, it's partly due to the evolution of the city and what people want to get out of it. The nastiness seems to filter out of social media. I like social media and forums and the fact that people don't just have to listen to the media, but instead get to respond to it....the downside is that anyone can respond with anything. It can get pretty ugly at times.Could be. There is definitely a lot of ugliness. On the other hand, this could be a sign of Calgary's maturation into a big city with multiple power centres. Calgary (and Alberta) as a whole have been a one-industry, one-party town for so long people probably aren't used to contested elections. I was reading some stats on Calgary's electoral history and it's pretty crazy how uncontested municipal politics has been. The last elected incumbent mayor to lose re-election was Ross Alger in 1980 (defeated by Ralph Klein). The average margin of victory for incumbent mayors is 35% of the vote. (I'm getting this from Jack Lucas' twitter feed - U of C Political Scientist). The conservative "old boys club" basically dominated the city until Nenshi won in 2010 and the NDP won at the provincial level in 2015. Even if conservatives take over City Hall and the Provincial Legislature, I'd like to think that it won't represent a return to the bad old days of one-party rule.
I'm not happy with Sean Chu who's in my ward, his whole stance with the Green Line still burns me.I found The Herald (limited free page reading warning) has done a pretty good bit of interviewing on the candidates for various wards:
I don't really have time to read all the other wards, but was wondering if anyone else is unhappy with the quality of the candidates running in their ward?
Meant to reply to this last night, but my son needed attending to...Ironically, a conservative council will likely be much more supportive of anti-urban NIMBYism in the inner-city, since it fits with their view of city-building. The best way to handle development in the inner-city is not to fight density, but to ensure that density is added in a way that produces walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods and not the "vertical suburbs" that we see in the west side of downtown. So even in the inner-city, developers cannot be left to "run wild". They need urban-minded councilors to press them on the principles of good urbanism.
As a Marda Loop resident myself, I welcome increased density as long as it makes the neighborhood more walkable and increases the mixed-use character of the neighborhood. The ARPs are not written in stone and, because they are created by the community, they typically err toward NIMBYism. The current Marda Loop ARP is too restrictive in my opinion. There is demand to extend mid-rise and mixed-used development well beyond the current boundaries of the BRZ and we should embrace that demand. There's no reason, other than a misguided desire to preserve 1950s-style suburban lifestyles, that 33 Ave shouldn't be lined with mid-rise, mixed-use development all the way to 14 st (and 14 st all the way to 17 ave).
Duking it out on social media is the new norm, and when people can say whatever they want from behind the keyboard, they often will. We'll see more of this when the provincial election comes around I'm sure. I don't follow social media much, but yesterday I looked through a pile of tweets, and saw there is some crazy stuff out there.Is it just me, or is this election gone way overboard in contentiousness? I don't recall an election like this before. I wonder how of that is due to social media?
That's true. I mischaracterized the process. However, council has little motivation to get in a fight with a community when these plans are created. The real compromise comes when someone wants to do something that violates the ARP.ARPs are NOT created by the community
I think it's fair to call the former president of the PC party a conservative. I also think it's fair to call a candidate who's slogan is "tax warrior" and who has the full support of SaveCalgary a conservative (e.g. Davis). As for calling them pro-sprawl, their platforms (what little has been released) speak for themselves. Davis has come out AGAINST secondary suites. He has stated that low-rise, single family neighborhood should be preserved in the inner-city. He has expressed doubt about bike lanes. He has repeatedly said that Calgary is a "car-centric city", which is not a explicit endorsement but is basically an argument used to justify car-centric planning. Is that enough proof for you, or should I go on? Because there's a lot more to say about that.it is completely unfair and oversimplification to paint conservative minded candidates (something that is difficult to actually claim a candidate is, because there are no political parties at the municipal level, so it is just projecting your personal bias on someones limited policy releases) as simply pro-sprawl
I don't doubt his faith has created polarisation as well. Recent terrorist events have given his religion a negative image. I'm not sure how religious he is, but for many people he's tied to that image like it or not. Yesterday I saw someone posted a tweet showing an old video of him defending the Niqab, so certainly some people are pushing that angle.
He’s made his mistakes in the last couple of years. Nenshi’s skin has grown thinner, not thicker, with mounting criticism. Midfield Park is a disaster. Taxes have risen too far, too fast.
But if he wins after this monumental scare, he’ll likely be a chastened and humbled mayor.
This is by far the most interesting election in a long time.CBC has a nice summary of "Wards to watch in this Calgary election":
City Hall may get a shake up not with a new Mayor, but with a lot of new councilors.
Arcticle about the two recent polls: one showing Smith way ahead and the other showing Nenshi way ahead.
Braid: As election day nears, are voters turning away from Smith?
Interesting quote from the article