Brookfield Place | 246.88m | 56s | AFK

General rating of the project

  • Great

    Votes: 8 14.3%
  • Very Good

    Votes: 32 57.1%
  • Good

    Votes: 14 25.0%
  • So So

    Votes: 2 3.6%
  • Not Very Good

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Terrible

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    56
That Sonny Tomic pick is sweet. Okay I'll put it on Wikipedia today.
 
2017 Feb 13 042.JPG 2017 Feb 13 041.JPG 2017 Feb 13 040.JPG 2017 Feb 13 039.JPG 2017 Feb 13 022.JPG
2017 Feb 13 039.JPG
 

Attachments

  • 2017 Feb 13 042.JPG
    2017 Feb 13 042.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 191
  • 2017 Feb 13 041.JPG
    2017 Feb 13 041.JPG
    1 MB · Views: 175
  • 2017 Feb 13 040.JPG
    2017 Feb 13 040.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 197
  • 2017 Feb 13 039.JPG
    2017 Feb 13 039.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 285
  • 2017 Feb 13 022.JPG
    2017 Feb 13 022.JPG
    1.5 MB · Views: 174
Last edited:
I love that angle, if only it looked that slim from the north-south view, Brookfield would have quite a tall slender profile from all angles. From the actual north-south profile though, it's a bit beefy.
 
nah that's suck if all 4 side are skinny. Good thing is building in Calgary are quite massive which is what i like it's doesn't look impressive on the skyline but once you got inside downtown you will feel it

I love that angle, if only it looked that slim from the north-south view, Brookfield would have quite a tall slender profile from all angles. From the actual north-south profile though, it's a bit beefy.
 
Got some photos of said new materials :D

00-2017 Feb 23 005.JPG 00-2017 Feb 23 063.JPG 00-2017 Feb 23 065.JPG 00-2017 Feb 23 065a.jpg 00-2017 Feb 23 065-s.jpg 00-2017 Feb 23 069a.jpg 00-2017 Feb 23 071.JPG 00-2017 Feb 23 072.JPG 00-2017 Feb 23 073.JPG 00-2017 Feb 23 084.jpg
00-2017 Feb 23 065.JPG

00-2017 Feb 23 072.JPG

00-2017 Feb 23 065-s.jpg

00-2017 Feb 23 065a.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 00-2017 Feb 23 005.JPG
    00-2017 Feb 23 005.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 166
  • 00-2017 Feb 23 063.JPG
    00-2017 Feb 23 063.JPG
    1.8 MB · Views: 184
  • 00-2017 Feb 23 065.JPG
    00-2017 Feb 23 065.JPG
    1.6 MB · Views: 287
  • 00-2017 Feb 23 065a.jpg
    00-2017 Feb 23 065a.jpg
    313.7 KB · Views: 258
  • 00-2017 Feb 23 065-s.jpg
    00-2017 Feb 23 065-s.jpg
    126.4 KB · Views: 578
  • 00-2017 Feb 23 069a.jpg
    00-2017 Feb 23 069a.jpg
    160.3 KB · Views: 182
  • 00-2017 Feb 23 071.JPG
    00-2017 Feb 23 071.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 187
  • 00-2017 Feb 23 072.JPG
    00-2017 Feb 23 072.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 280
  • 00-2017 Feb 23 073.JPG
    00-2017 Feb 23 073.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 178
  • 00-2017 Feb 23 084.jpg
    00-2017 Feb 23 084.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 185
Last edited:
Thank god! That's what I was hoping for, for them to put up a smooth surface instead of having those mechanical elements showing.
 
Anyone else completely losing their mind staring at that one light blue piece of spandrel along the very top row towards the right? It completely stands out in a bad way as the shade is noticeably different. I hope they fix it!
 
While I will wait to see the completed project to pass final judgement, I am not sure these new panels are going to substantially change the look of the tower for most viewpoints. The crown's glass is still going to look very different from the rest of the tower, which I felt was the whole problem, not the mechanical looking backing.
 

Back
Top