News   Apr 03, 2020
 5.9K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 7.5K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 4.5K     0 

Urban Development and Proposals Discussion

I think the province is going to tighten the purse strings in the face of tariffs, and that seems like the right call to me. The city should be considering the same.
I mean tightening doesn't mean you don't spend any money... you know, jobs. I'd argue this fieldhouse would pay for itself in the economic impact it would have.
 
I just think they (the province) should be more cautious given the revenue hit they may have to take with tariffs on oil. Not saying whether or not that should factor into the fieldhouse or any project specifically, just that it's likely a good time for financial prudence...
 
I just think they (the province) should be more cautious given the revenue hit they may have to take with tariffs on oil. Not saying whether or not that should factor into the fieldhouse or any project specifically, just that it's likely a good time for financial prudence...
Almost like the costs associated with funding a province shouldn't just be covered by resource extraction revenue... In the good times it is easy to get by but in the tough times, which typically coincides with lower resource revenue, would be nice to have money to pay for the basics let alone a fieldhouse.

Might also help if you didn't need to distract the population from your scandal by giving people who don't need it an extra $30 on their paycheques. That money is far more useful to the government than it is to me paying for lunch one day a week.
 
Last edited:
Can't find the link where this is from, but the city has released a map showing the neighborhoods that have seen the most multi-family proposals approved that would have normally gone through a land use application before blanket zoning. I thought Mt Pleasant and Capitol Hill were busy, but Bowness even busier.

1740710908416.png


 
Can't find the link where this is from, but the city has released a map showing the neighborhoods that have seen the most multi-family proposals approved that would have normally gone through a land use application before blanket zoning. I thought Mt Pleasant and Capitol Hill were busy, but Bowness even busier.

View attachment 633532


 
With all of this extra density building happening in inner city neighborhoods, I'd like to see the city look at doing property taxes differently. Instead of simply using straight up market value, maybe a hybrid of market value + square footage of the property. People shouldn't be penalized because their inner-city homes have higher values per square foot.
 
A grand total of zero in Bonavista. Guess that meeting where all those people made a fuss scared the developers away. Or maybe market conditions still exist and these things end up where they would've always ended up and the city did nothing but cut some red tape for valuable density increases. Blanket rezoning should've been called Practical Services Zoning, or to appeal to a certain person, Common Sense Zoning.
 

Back
Top