jianxia15
Active Member
Infill townhome in Bankview at the junction of 16 St and 21 Ave.
This block along Macleod southbound has a bit going on. It has the 1503 1ST proposal for apartments, the lot along 1ST and 15th AVE is for sale and now... I see this development permit to makeover the building on the corner of 1ST and 17AVE.
View attachment 509018
Is it different? Yes. Is it better? No. There are random random planters, a weird rock garden (which I guess is better than dead grass), a pull through driveway, and generally really poor urban design.
View attachment 509019
Thinking about this a bit and the applicant listed (a BBQ place), I am starting to get the impression the whole design is literally just to figure out how to load the garbage bins while doing minimal renovations as possible and not interfering with the flow of 1st Street SE car sewer.This block along Macleod southbound has a bit going on. It has the 1503 1ST proposal for apartments, the lot along 1ST and 15th AVE is for sale and now... I see this development permit to makeover the building on the corner of 1ST and 17AVE.
View attachment 509018
Is it different? Yes. Is it better? No. There are random random planters, a weird rock garden (which I guess is better than dead grass), a pull through driveway, and generally really poor urban design.
View attachment 509019
BBQ Place is beside it to the west.the applicant listed (a BBQ place)
They didn't. Interest rates made the hurdle rate for investment much higher, so lowed investment. This will reduce the capital cost, enabling construction with the higher hurdle rate.These changes might not be much, but if they help spur even a dozen builds, it’s better than nothing.
I’m curious if developers knew the GST announcement was coming, and they’ve been holding off on some of their builds until it takes effect. GST on a $30 million building is a lot of money.
No irrigated planters filled with rocks, 100% of the design is how to get a garbage removal truck to the Molok garbage system that will be the centre piece of the frontage onto 17th Ave. Truly inspirational stuff. They couldn’t have extended the building forward to meet the sidewalk or used the 17 Ave frontage area for huge patios? Just garbage removal and two parking stalls, gotcha. At least the mobility engineers reviewing the file will love it.This block along Macleod southbound has a bit going on. It has the 1503 1ST proposal for apartments, the lot along 1ST and 15th AVE is for sale and now... I see this development permit to makeover the building on the corner of 1ST and 17AVE.
View attachment 509018
Is it different? Yes. Is it better? No. There are random random planters, a weird rock garden (which I guess is better than dead grass), a pull through driveway, and generally really poor urban design.
View attachment 509019
They are free to request heritage designation of their homes at any time, but so far they mostly haven't, interesting hey?When the R-CG comes up for a vote, expect all the usual suspects (Elbow Park, Rosedale, Mount Royal) to seek and receive exceptions because “heritage”. There will be some upzoning in poorer neighborhoods where developers don’t want to build rowhouses anyway.
Development engineers at the city are very inflexible on allowing any design that requires a garbage truck to back up onto a major street - this is 100% driving the site plan.No irrigated planters filled with rocks, 100% of the design is how to get a garbage removal truck to the Molok garbage system that will be the centre piece of the frontage onto 17th Ave. Truly inspirational stuff. They couldn’t have extended the building forward to meet the sidewalk or used the 17 Ave frontage area for huge patios? Just garbage removal and two parking stalls, gotcha. At least the mobility engineers reviewing the file will love it.
Meanwhile, the Underwood site has garbage trucks parking on the damn sidewalk and then backing into 1st every day... lol
This is a great take but reality, at least in my area, is a little different. What you want is happening in Altadore/Marda Loop along 19th and 20th Streets there are multiple Row/Townhomes going in while 33rd Avenue gets Sarina Apartment after Sarina Apartment. The issue with 33rd is the fact they built multiple duplexes and infills over the last 20 years that will be right next to half block apartments.I think this is more a function about where this kind of density is not allowed, rather than where it is. It's not that we should restrict to apartments only, it's that we shouldn't restrict high density townhomes to mostly only main streets.These new row home developments are great density boosters, but are occurring on the main streets because they have difficultly going into the neighbourhoods themselves. We are seeing a reflection of strong demand for townhomes and ground-oriented stuff outcompeting apartments because they are directly competing in often the only strips of reasonably high-density zoning in many blocks.
I'd prefer to see everything allow this kind of row house development, including main streets and off streets. Political issues aside - I don't see a compelling public good rationale why we would limit small scale apartments and high density row housing anywhere.