TooBizzy
New Member
Also... BIOCUBE ROOM?
Happy to supply the model file to anyone who'd like to play around with it, maybe add some more detail, experiment with materials?
View attachment 619604View attachment 619605
Would be excited to see a more detailed floorplan on this. Hopefully the businesses on that block get to stay, and it's not just the facade being transferred over. Likewise, it would be great to utilize the space on 7th for small CRUs.Still really dislike the podium and 7th Ave treatment, as well as the heritage treatment
If it’s anything like the last one (which it appears to be) 7th will have zero heritage retention and probably no CRU’s or just a token one.Would be excited to see a more detailed floorplan on this. Hopefully the businesses on that block get to stay, and it's not just the facade being transferred over. Likewise, it would be great to utilize the space on 7th for small CRUs.
This project is definitely gonna be make-or-break on materials, but if it happens it'll be a couple thousand new residents injected right into the heart of Downtown. City-defining.
Thanks for doing this mockup. That looks insanely oppressive to me. The podium is a fortress plopped on top of our largest pedestrian street. Bankers Hall is set back a bit and retains much more of the structure of the heritage building, whereas this (from what I can tell from the drawings) is pure facadism with zero setback. From the first angle it completely blots out the sky.Just to really drive the point home... I struggle to see how this is anymore 'oppressive' on Stephen Ave's street feel than Bankers' Hall.
Funnily enough, this building is basically right at home, with widths that almost exactly match that of the surrounding Telus Sky, Brookfield, and other adjacent, older office towers.
Does Calgary want to be a world-class city or not? Let's get shovels in the ground on this thing.
Happy to supply the model file to anyone who'd like to play around with it, maybe add some more detail, experiment with materials?
View attachment 619604View attachment 619605
I think this is the older original DP showing both phase 1 and phase 2? Here's one of the original designs for phase 1, which was 66 storeys, but I recall that the second phase included a taller tower.Does anyone know if this is a real proposal? Or just some FAR-maximizing tire kicking from Triovest?
What’s the source of the details here?
Is this from a recent DP? I can't make out a date from the drawing, but I'm wondering if this is one of the older versions of the proposal.
I believe it is
Just to clarify, is it a new DP or a photo from the old version?I believe it is