Nimbus
Active Member
I'm going to go with option 1, as that is the plan for the entire building.Feels to me like one of two options:
1. Building a showsuite
2. Owner of the building moving into a big new unit
I'm going to go with option 1, as that is the plan for the entire building.Feels to me like one of two options:
1. Building a showsuite
2. Owner of the building moving into a big new unit
Oh jeez, wow that’ll be gorgeous. A massive upgrade, in an extremely prominent location, at the very least.Not much out there, except a partial rendering on HSCA website.
View attachment 466580
The rendering appears to roughly match this angle.
View attachment 466581
Except we are losing rental stock for less giant condos. I'm not chalking that up as a win.Oh jeez, wow that’ll be gorgeous. A massive upgrade, in an extremely prominent location, at the very least.
It's a bad interpretation of the HUB building.Kinda weird that they did three solar panels on the first row then 6 rows of 2 panels and the last row of a single solar panel. I thought they were engineers? Do they need help dividing? This could of looked a lot better IMHO.
I personally think it looks fine, since the whole side is basically filled in I find it sticks out less. I'm assuming they didn't have the option to evenly split the rows if they wanted to fill the whole wall. So better to get more energy/solar cells and have it not symmetric than to have half the wall filled with symmetric panels IMO.Kinda weird that they did three solar panels on the first row then 6 rows of 2 panels and the last row of a single solar panel. I thought they were engineers? Do they need help dividing? This could of looked a lot better IMHO.
It was the same style as the McBarges at Expo86I don't have a strong opinion one way or another on the new layout, but I will say that a part of me will miss that weird 50s-through-the-lens-of-the-80s PoMo aesthetic that was going on in that McDonalds. It certainly had character.