Disraeli
Active Member
Don't existing surface lots need a renewal of the land use every 5 years or so? If so the DP could be for the surface lot behind the building.
We hope not but developers got most city councilors, especially the mayor, by the throat.Parking is over supplied these days, unless it's an existing parking lot there's no chance it happens.
How do you figure that? The City has been pretty consistent in saying no to new parking lots downtown for quite a while now.We hope not but developers got most city councilors, especially the mayor, by the throat.
they say yes to more trees then developers cut trees down to make room for bigger mansions!How do you figure that? The City has been pretty consistent in saying no to new parking lots downtown for quite a while now.
Lol that’s f*cked up.
The DP is approved so expect some gravel to adorn that corner for years to come.
My impression when I worked there was that it was. Surface parking was seen as a good temporary use when a building had passed its useful economic life. There was even less scrutiny when a public agency like Transit or Police wanted a new surface parking lot.is this process just a rubber stamp? really flies in the face of all the rhetoric that comes out of city hall. they seem to be pro parking as much as they are pro anything.
That is good to know. The City imo needs to grow a set of balls and ask for better temp uses. The problem is the landlord has done sweet f*** all to maintain or increase the attractiveness of the building to tenants. They have tried absolutely nothing with the buildings onsite and then claim they could be at "the end of there useful life". Crazy that older buildings in so many other city's landlords seem to half-ass maintain and keep useful for much longer, i suspect it is more of the conservative/corporate mentality of the landlord in this instance. Half of the subject site is literally already surface parking lot, why give them more? But i mean there must be so much demand for more surface parking there is just none nearby (red being surface parking or multi-storey parkade):My impression when I worked there was that it was. Surface parking was seen as a good temporary use when a building had passed its useful economic life. There was even less scrutiny when a public agency like Transit or Police wanted a new surface parking lot.