darwink
Senior Member
Noble by Truman iirc
Indeed it is. Looks like Brookfield's Ivy is just to the north.Noble by Truman iirc
CPC next week is a big one. Here is the link to the full agenda (I do miss the days of individual links for each item, sigh...)
http://www.calgary.ca/PDA/pd/Docume...ission/agenda/2017/agenda-cpc-december-14.pdf
Items of interest:
5.01 (page 151/961) - Amendments to the LUB, Eau Claire ARP and Centre City Plan. I know, amendments to bylaws and policy documents may not seem that interesting, but this represents a pretty major shift in planning policy in Calgary. These changes are to accommodate the removal of the long-standing cash-in-lieu policy that applied to downtown, forcing developers to only construct 50% of their required parking, and pay the rest to the City, to be used to construct parkades on the fringe of downtown. Now, you can build 100% of your required parking if you want to, but if you build less, you still pay into a fund, which is then used to fund alternative modes of transportation infrastructure.
5.10 (page 295/961) - Co-op Dalhousie. DP drawings start on page 317.
5.12 (page 437/961) - Lacaille on 1st Land Use redesignation in Eau Claire.
5.13 (page 459/961) - Grosvner 4th Street Land Use redesignation.
5.16 (page 507/961) - DP for some townhomes in Greenwich, across from COP. DP drawings start on page 520.
5.17 (page 593) and 5.18 (page 628) and 5.19 (page 661) - All related to Truman's West District (policy amendment, Land Use and Outline Plan).
5.22 (page 769/961) - Hines 500 Block DP. DP drawings start on page 786, renderings on 831.
We should really think of these kinds of things as car infrastructure. Pedestrian infrastructure is cheap. Re-time the lights so the wait isn't a lifetime to cross, open a new cross-walk, provide better lighting etc. Pedestrian infrastructure is only expensive when the main goal has nothing to do with pedestrians at all, its to facilitate high volumes of car movements (as is the case here).I like that overpass a lot. Looks very sleek.
Only thing I didn't like was the price tag.
500 Block looks amazing!![]()
We should really think of these kinds of things as car infrastructure. Pedestrian infrastructure is cheap. Re-time the lights so the wait isn't a lifetime to cross, open a new cross-walk, provide better lighting etc. Pedestrian infrastructure is only expensive when the main goal has nothing to do with pedestrians at all, its to facilitate high volumes of car movements (as is the case here).