MichaelS
Senior Member
Threatened with a needle is next level scary.
my understanding is part of it is intentional introduction - somewhere in the supply chain cutting the drug you thought with some meth. Now you're on meth. Part is intentional exploration on the part of the user. And part is opioids make you lethargic/sleep. So why not counter that with meth if you get assaulted in your sleep/your stuff gets stolen.I don't get how meth has become so prevalent, everyone knows how bad it is, we can see it, but people keep doing it. Fentanyl is a result of oxy, so that I can understand...
Threatened with a needle is next level scary.
Part of the problem is that not everyone gets addicted to meth, and surprisingly a high number don't if they only try it a few times. This leads to a number of people thinking they'll be one of those people who can have it without being addicted. It's actually less addictive then other drugs like cocaine, and even nicotine, but ....... once you are addicted the effects are much worse then other substances.I don't get how meth has become so prevalent, everyone knows how bad it is, we can see it, but people keep doing it. Fentanyl is a result of oxy, so that I can understand...
How perfectly poorly timed.'Brilliant' proposal for vacant building could help improve Calgary's public safety
It hasn't seen regular bus services in more than four years, but Calgary's old Greyhound Bus terminal could still serve the city – exactly how is now up to a city committee.calgary.ctvnews.ca
Sounds like the proposal isn't for housing, but for services. A supervised injection site and some other services.
Oh yes, just move the problem into a neighbourhood that is growing. Because we choose not to solve the problem, so lets move it. Much better for our morals anyways. What was that about East Village redevelopment not causing displacing? Who cares!In a vacuum, the barriers that surround West Village (and the lack of development potential in the near future) make it a much better location for the kinds of services that the Drop-In Center provides than East Village.
I am a little confused by the proposal, however. It makes a big deal out of saying "this isn't another drop-in center!" then proceeds to say it will offer almost exactly the same services as the DI.
I completely understand where you're coming from. But isn't this what we have all talked about? Giving them a place to go that isn't a bus booth on a C-Train platform.choose not to solve the problem