Glenmore Landing | 115m | 35s | RioCan | NORR

I always thought more could be done with the Heritage Park-ing lots. Especially the three along 14th Street. They're seldom used (this looks like a summer day and only three parking lots are being used). This is city land so pretty easy for the city to turnaround and make something happen here. It comes with a built in neighborhood trolley!
View attachment 617372
I think it would be really cool to develop most of those parking lots (and build maybe a handful of parking garages) and produce a legit main street where the buildings get progressively "older" the close you get to heritage park. So they can be more modern towards 14th and traditional as you approach the park. I'm normally pretty against making buildings look old or building in traditional styles, but in the case of heritage park it could probably work.
 
The town square at the entrance to Heritage Park is actually one of the nicer little urban plazas we have in the city in my opinion. Lined with shops and cafes. You don't even need to pay the park admission to access them either.
 
The town square at the entrance to Heritage Park is actually one of the nicer little urban plazas we have in the city in my opinion. Lined with shops and cafes. You don't even need to pay the park admission to access them either.
I've biked there a few times with my kid. Sometimes we get ice cream and hang out for a bit, and ride the trolley, but don't actually pay the entrance fee and enter the park itself.
 
That was the render the NIMBYs were using, the developer did not create that. We talked about it on here some time ago, especially how the traffic bypassing the site and having nothing to do with it was total gridlock lol. Apparently people are susceptible to misinformation...

One has to wonder if the residents that were opposed would accept ANY redevelopment at all on that site. They kept banging on “we aren’t opposed to development, just not (fill in the blank)”. Very typical Nimbyism.

I don't think that's true. Yes there will be a certain number that will and maybe that area is different but in my area where there has been development, there is a clear differentiation between what people oppose and not oppose. If they had applied for land use that matched UD or even Kensington, I think it would've been approved with much less opposition. It's not really an assurance to residents that "the developer won't build to that height" when it's approved because if the developer does there is no legal avenues to stop it. The residents can't then go to council to say "I know land use allows this but their original renderings were much shorter". Council will say well the land use is the land use, the renderings were just for information. The residents' renderings were exaggerated but we know developers do the same thing.

And honestly, maybe it's time Council focus its investments in areas that are accepting of intensification. We are closing pools, for example, in Beltline and Inglewood rather than in these communities whose residents don't want to see any population growth. These communities are advocating for their populations to decline, and we should invest more in communities that are growing rapidly instead.
Absolutely agree and we need to make this more obvious and transactional. There should community funds tied directly into unit approval. It's a shame that we are still relying on 2019 census data that shows many Calgary neighborhoods losing residents when that's no longer the case. There needs to be a mechanism, tying development to funding that makes the funds flow as new residents are added and not every half a decade/decade when they redo the census. The CBE is asking for that from the province and I think the city should do the same. We know the unit/bedroom counts, it's not that difficult to make estimate of population change.
 
There needs to be a mechanism, tying development to funding that makes the funds flow as new residents are added and not every half a decade/decade when they redo the census.
There was an attempt to do that. Before the last election the fund was raided for projects for communities not having much if any redevelopment. A big project was Vivo iirc, in Gondek's ward that Gondek had not otherwise secured funding for. Sunalta I think was another beneficiary, but would have to go back and look to be sure.
 
The guy Sean Chu defeated by a margin of 0.2% (Daniel Kelly) would have voted in favor of this project.
Don't forget Ward 7, Wong voted against this and he squeaked by in 2021 with two other candidates in Heather McRae and Erin Waite splitting the vote against him while almost getting the same # of votes as him
 
Don't forget Ward 7, Wong voted against this and he squeaked by in 2021 with two other candidates in Heather McRae and Erin Waite splitting the vote against him while almost getting the same # of votes as him
Wong won because there were like 17 candidates in Ward 7, and they were all mostly saying the same things. To his credit, he was the only candidate of all those who came to my door. Sometimes in a crowded field, that little bit of extra effort pays dividends when people are largely undecided amongst a field of relatively unknown candidates.

I see Heather McRae is running under the "Calgary Party" banner (the same banner Brian Thiessen is running for mayor under). The Calgary party are positioning themselves as the centrist option (sort of like the Alberta Party was provincially). That might gain her some additional exposure next fall, if the field of candidates is crowded again.
 
Wong won because there were like 17 candidates in Ward 7, and they were all mostly saying the same things. To his credit, he was the only candidate of all those who came to my door. Sometimes in a crowded field, that little bit of extra effort pays dividends when people are largely undecided amongst a field of relatively unknown candidates.

I see Heather McRae is running under the "Calgary Party" banner (the same banner Brian Thiessen is running for mayor under). The Calgary party are positioning themselves as the centrist option (sort of like the Alberta Party was provincially). That might gain her some additional exposure next fall, if the field of candidates is crowded again.
DJ Kelly was also at that event.
 
Don't forget Ward 7, Wong voted against this and he squeaked by in 2021 with two other candidates in Heather McRae and Erin Waite splitting the vote against him while almost getting the same # of votes as him
True, but there is also Carra who squeaked in by ~160 votes over a candidate who definitely voted against this. And Penner barely won Ward 11 due in part to some vote splitting among more conservative candidates.
 
I hope a fiscally responsible conservative runs and wins.
The inevitable problem is that is impossible, as someone credible who doesn’t understand municipal government will always undercut the reasonable person’s tax promise.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top