FriendlyDrunks
Active Member
Where abouts are you? We've had a fair bit of rain lately.Hmmm my grass looks like dead straw because I’m not allowed to water it, yet somehow this new sod that was just installed is greener than a rain forest…..
Where abouts are you? We've had a fair bit of rain lately.Hmmm my grass looks like dead straw because I’m not allowed to water it, yet somehow this new sod that was just installed is greener than a rain forest…..
Perhaps try planting micro clover, or another drought resistant ground cover?I’m in Evanston, but my house is a corner lot on the ridge facing SW so I get battered by sun and wind all day every day….
Almost no venues from the 88 olympics would have been suitable. It would have cost us tens of billions. Yeah, one big missed opportunity.Interesting article. Certainly I dont think it makes any sense to compare an Event Centre or BMO, to community rec facilities or the green line. The first 2, while having local benefit, are economic drivers in that they bring the outside to Calgary. Those short term lifts that fill hotels, restaurants, ect... Community rec facilities, parks, affordable housing public transit ect are all annual operational losses that you take on to provide ease and quality of life to your citizens...but they dont directly help you economically, it's more of a wholistic vision that hopefully drives people to move here . If all we ever did was invest in those, the city would be "boring", but operate well. If it was the inverse, we'd be a tourist mecca but a horseshit place to live. You need to do both.
True. I'll go to the grave that the Olympics were a huge missed opportunity for the city, given what we already have in play to use, the external investment that we'll never see now. Just a calamity in how it was rolled out
Almost no venues from the 88 olympics would have been suitable. It would have cost us tens of billions. Yeah, one big missed opportunity.
100000%...as i've mentioned before...i want to start an agency who's sole motto is "things that look good, and mean nothing". Nobody gives a $^&% what it means, just make it look good for Calgary/\Yeah some of those allusions and metaphors seem a bit far fetched. Sometimes I wish they'd drop the pretentious BS and just say "we did this because we thought it would look cool".
I as well but I draw the line at reasoning for all decisions based on practical affects and impacts on users. Straight and to the point. None of that designer froufrou shit. Aesthetic choices are aesthetic choices and considerations are cohesion, longevity, cost, and availability etc. If clients don't like that I don't expound that the material choice reflects a period reminiscent of a time where you and they came together in broadening harmony as angels hummed the chorus of Over the Rainbow... You don't hire me for that. You hire me because my work is solid.I run a design studio myself, and having an overarching concept definitely helps to move the design process along, as well as to help bring (usually not particularly creative) clients on board by attaching a story to the idea. Having said that, there's definitely a fine line, and the amount of pure BS that gets loaded onto these things is ridiculous. Especially when there is lots of money involved and people on all sides feel they need a thick document to justify the costs.