rpeng
New Member
interesting design to see the X braces on the upper floor but not continuous to the floor belowView attachment 275636View attachment 275637View attachment 275638View attachment 275639
Starting to see some serious exterior progress
interesting design to see the X braces on the upper floor but not continuous to the floor belowView attachment 275636View attachment 275637View attachment 275638View attachment 275639
Starting to see some serious exterior progress
interesting design to see the X braces on the upper floor but not continuous to the floor below
i am thinking if you don't need it on the first floor then the second don't require it either as you can still transfer that load to the shear walls as similar to L1- which is why i found it oddIt's a structural feature, not architectural, for lateral stability against Wind/Seismic. Forces increase the higher you go, the first floor resistance is likely covered by the concreate shear walls and the one or two cross braces on the far west side. Also because its only a ~3 storey building in Calgary (not a high seismic zone) more than a couple cross braces is total overkill and only serves to increase cost, and would be a very expensive architectural feature to include for just aesthetics.
So much will depend on how it meets the sidewalk. That's what will make the difference between suburban professional centre or urban main street.I have to say, I’m kind of disappointed in the design. That first picture reminds me of a suburban medical clinic/professional centre.
Thankfully the function far outweighs the form.