It's a good route that needed cycle lanes, but I have many nits to pick here. There are 2 not-so-obvious criteria I have for evaluating bike infrastructure:
1. Can I ride it and pay as much 'attention' as I would driving a similar route? (ie. in a car you'd be on the lookout for peds/intersections/driveways, but you wouldn't be white-knuckled and covering the brake the whole time.)
A: I'd have to ride it to be sure, but it looks like a no:
- Tons of driveways, where the bike lane feels like a visitor/intruder on the car's ramp. - Intersections feel a little messy, creating a purgatory between pedestrian/vehicle status. It should be clear that cyclists have a straight-through ROW, but I can see some ambiguity for drivers to think a 'mounted cyclist doesn't have ROW in a crosswalk'. Most of the ramps into intersections look pretty smooth, but it make it a little hairy to shoulder check for a right-turning vehicle.
2. Can I comfortably tow a child in a bike-trailer?
Maybe somewhat. You really feel the bumps when towing, and that road is a little too busy to feel great about it.
So at least for me, this is the kind of infrastructure where I'd prefer to stay on the road when solo and wanting to go fast. With a trailer I'd probably take the longer way to the north.
I'd have preferred physically separated lanes at street grade for both directions on the north side; ideally eliminate left turns onto/off of a bunch of the NB streets.