The debate also kind of illustrates a key point I think. Our public dialogue - not the esoteric urban nerd sub-culture of all you smart folks with your well thought-out commentary - but the Richard White style v. anything else in the Herald or CBC about Calgary as a city is pretty amateurish:
The Richard White (RW) style articles, summarized as:
- Everything is fine.
- If it isn't fine - the problem is inferred to be you, not the city ("Transit sucks? Well Calgary's a driving city so buy a car! Man what a great city to drive in - we really are the best!" etc.)
- We don't have anything to learn from any other city.
- Calgary is the best, look at these surface level examples.
The other article we get occasionally is like the opinion piece, typically from a viewpoint that isn't the dominant main stream as a standard RW Herald booster article:
- Everything is not fine, here's some examples.
- Some people don't feel included in the way we build our city (Calgary not being as inclusive as boosters think it is, Calgary not being cool, Calgary losing young people etc.)
- Other cities do some stuff better, especially on stuff that Richard White style boosterism ignores (non-mainstream cultures, minority issues, inclusion etc.)
The reality is obviously somewhere in between, but we don't have sophistication or effective, ongoing public dialogue about it in the media. Boring booster articles and a controversial, occasional dunks disagreeing.
Of course the truth is in between - Calgary is great at some things, Calgary totally sucks at others. Lots of the good and bad is empirically measurable (we are measurable good or bad at some things); some of it is up to the perception of an individual that lives here.
Personally I think the RW articles (and the culture that creates them) about generic boosterism and lazy analysis is a barrier to how people think about the city and how people see the city changing. Calgary will change no matter what - so better at least try to make changes for the better. "everything is fine" articles don't help and only calcify the discourse into a shallow, unhelpful blandness.
This line from
@darwink I really liked:
Yeah, we don't market well enough the 'you know, even if you grew up in Calgary, you and your friends should all move downtown when you're in your early 20s and sell/mostly park your cars'.
Yeah no kidding - if you googled anything about Calgary as a city and it's urban culture in the past 20 years you'd get Stampede ads and RW articles. Remember, according to him it's all good everywhere - our new burbs are great an vibrant! It's like bicycling in Copenhagen everywhere!
With the way Calgary portrays itself in the loudest media by the loudest voices, it's no wonder many people who come here fail to stumble into our subcultures and our best things and decide to leave a few years later!