Stampede Station | 277.3m | 70s | Truman | NORR

FCC1982 said:
2029 for W (the taller one) and 2030 for JW.

As someone said earlier - we better not fumble this ….
Click to expand...
Given the focus of development in the area, I think for this one, we will not end up fumbling this. We shall see though, I certainly would be quite disappointed if it fell through or is changed much for the worse.
 
Connecting Skybridge / Skypool at 50th Floor? Skyslide down to centre Ice at the new arena?
 
Docs are up
W 277.3
JW 245.55

Screenshot_20250723-113730.png
Screenshot_20250723-113745.png
Screenshot_20250723-113800.png
Screenshot_20250723-113823.jpg
 
Last edited:
Do those renderings show the newest version? I expected more of a height difference. From some angles like the north the shorter tower even looks like an identical twin.
 
YYCALGARY said:
You might also have to factor in appeals timelines. They are asking for a reduction to building separation distance and I can see Vetro and Sasso east facing owners being somewhat successful in pushing back on that. It appears as though the proposed facades are a zero setback which is fine, but even twin residential towers follow the minimum separation distances for light and privacy concerns, as well as general livability. If you look at Vancouver and even proposed towers here, many will offset with adjacent buildings to allay these concerns and provide better overall living conditions for everyone.

Maybe it’ll morph into an even taller tower with a greater setback from the west property line. But I can almost guarantee that unless Truman provides frosted windows, screening, and or amenity privileges in lieu to impacted neighbours this will likely not move forward exactly as shown.
Click to expand...
From knowing someone who lives there, apparently this is exactly what the condo board is aiming to get from them.
 
Here's a crappy shop putting the towers into position from the more notable angle in the North. Though from here they'll be a little bit wider, and the gap between them a little bit less. Juust tall enough to poke out from behind the Bow.

1753298570128.png
 
Albertasaurus said:
Can I ask where you found those numbers? I just checked and the elevation drawings show 277.3 and 245.55, in line with what Surreal posted a few days back? Unless I'm reading them wrong, which is certainly possible...
Click to expand...
I just went off the numbers on the elevation, but I could also be wrong lol
Edit, apparently the grade is the actual grade of the ground and not 100m standard
 
Last edited:
Albertasaurus said:
Can I ask where you found those numbers? I just checked and the elevation drawings show 277.3 and 245.55, in line with what Surreal posted a few days back? Unless I'm reading them wrong, which is certainly possible...
Click to expand...
Probs just a simple misread - elevation says 277.3m (377300) and 245.55m (345550) (grade always starts at 100m or 100000 for some reason)
Tallest and 4th tallest in Alberta?

1753299919185.png
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top