News   Apr 03, 2020
 5.7K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 7.4K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 4.4K     0 

Roads, Highways & Infrastructure

I’m not entirely sure why this is news! It’s only a 1 km stretch of road! Yes I get that it closes a gap in the road, but there’s a lot of work yet to get this entire east/west road up to snuff!
It’s a big 1km section though. It connects the gravel pits and communities on its western end with those in other parts of North Calgary. Before you had to head south to Stoney tr to get there. Now all the construction traffic can use 144 right across the north part of calgary. From 11st NE all the way to 85st NW and beyond uninterrupted. There are at least a 1/2 dozen new communities along the stretch that rely on it.
 
https://calgary.citynews.ca/2024/10/07/calgary-highway-1-petro-canada-relocation/

No sense of timing, but sounds like the 22/TCH junction will finally get a proper fix.

I wonder what that will mean for a carpooling location?

Not sure what the proper term for them is, but it might be time for Alberta to get into some more mega rest stops.

It's been a while since I've driven in Ontario, but the ones they had with multiple gas stations and a sort of mini food court with a half dozen fast food joints would probably work really well in spots on highway 1 and 2.

Seems like the sort of thing that could even be integrated into interchange projects by a savvy planner...
 
Not sure what the proper term for them is, but it might be time for Alberta to get into some more mega rest stops.

It's been a while since I've driven in Ontario, but the ones they had with multiple gas stations and a sort of mini food court with a half dozen fast food joints would probably work really well in spots on highway 1 and 2.

Seems like the sort of thing that could even be integrated into interchange projects by a savvy planner...
Ontario has the "Onroute" stops every 70-100km along the major highways (Between Windsor, Montreal, and a couple on the 400 north). Typically there is one on both sides of the highway so that they don't need to build a major intersection, just a simple merge lane.

It would be great to have a couple of similar options along our highways. However, the article linked above sounds like the opposite will likely happen with the Petrocanada at 22/1 with their move being proposed to be further off the highway then it currently is.

1728410258554.png
 
Ontario has the "Onroute" stops every 70-100km along the major highways (Between Windsor, Montreal, and a couple on the 400 north). Typically there is one on both sides of the highway so that they don't need to build a major intersection, just a simple merge lane.

It would be great to have a couple of similar options along our highways. However, the article linked above sounds like the opposite will likely happen with the Petrocanada at 22/1 with their move being proposed to be further off the highway then it currently is.

View attachment 602588
These are great but I wonder how much more traffic is on the 401 than Hwy 1. The OnRoute is mainly on the stretch of highway between Windsor and Montreal which is a major economic corridor and has significant traffic everyday. I also find most of the time going to the mountains, Canmore is about where I'd like to take a break
 
Didn't they just redo that interchange and renovate the gas station like 2 years ago?
Yes and yes, but the road improvements were always known to be short term.

Looking at it again I wonder if there wasn't a good medium term solution by implementing a physical barrier between the through lanes and all of the other movements. But maybe the bridge is just insufficient or has a life cycle issue or something
 
I remember a few years ago a minister had a mandate of looking into renewing the government's rest areas, and they were exploring partnering with operators to upgrade and supplement. As with all things, it is much harder to do than announce, and haven't heard of anything since. Hard to do without acquiring more land, or chopping down trees. To then turn around and lease the land to a private operator, that can result in significant pushback from the original landowners.

here is the project webpage, with a list of locations:
 
I remember a few years ago a minister had a mandate of looking into renewing the government's rest areas, and they were exploring partnering with operators to upgrade and supplement. As with all things, it is much harder to do than announce, and haven't heard of anything since. Hard to do without acquiring more land, or chopping down trees. To then turn around and lease the land to a private operator, that can result in significant pushback from the original landowners.

here is the project webpage, with a list of locations:

Glad to see there's some sort of plan in the works. The curbside rest stops on hwy 2 really need to be eliminated asap. Incredibly unsafe for how busy the highway often is.

I've even experienced one cause major congestion on a Friday night with how poorly it was placed. Delayed my trip home to Calgary by nearly an hour.
 
I remember a few years ago a minister had a mandate of looking into renewing the government's rest areas, and they were exploring partnering with operators to upgrade and supplement. As with all things, it is much harder to do than announce, and haven't heard of anything since. Hard to do without acquiring more land, or chopping down trees. To then turn around and lease the land to a private operator, that can result in significant pushback from the original landowners.

here is the project webpage, with a list of locations:
It’s been crickets about this project for the past two years. Doesn’t seem to be a priority for a Dictator….errr I mean Premier, who would rather waste time poking her nose, where it clearly doesn’t or shouldn’t belong, into LGBTQ issues, and other issues of concern (for her only, nobody else seems to care very much). Okay, sorry, rant over!
 
Last edited:
So here's a graphic showing probably the narrowest section of Main Street in Seton compared to infamous massive one way roads lol. Does anybody know why developers would even want to do this? Do they just suck at designing roads? Is this the minimum city requirement? It's no good as a neighborhood street since your front yard is a freeway but it's also no good as a high capacity road because there's no formal lanes and every damn intersection is a gigantic uncontrolled nightmare. It must eat into the margins for all the extra room dedicated to road surface and stormwater infrastructure right?

main_st_labels-01.jpg
 
So here's a graphic showing probably the narrowest section of Main Street in Seton compared to infamous massive one way roads lol. Does anybody know why developers would even want to do this? Do they just suck at designing roads? Is this the minimum city requirement? It's no good as a neighborhood street since your front yard is a freeway but it's also no good as a high capacity road because there's no formal lanes and every damn intersection is a gigantic uncontrolled nightmare. It must eat into the margins for all the extra room dedicated to road surface and stormwater infrastructure right?

View attachment 603074
It's not just seton, passed by the new developments north of Sage Hill and those roads are massive, some even have medians on a supposedly "residential" street. On a slightly different note, why do so many people like to park on the street when they all clearly have a garage? I can't imagine parallel parking in front is really saving you that much time compared to the garage.
 

Back
Top