News   Apr 03, 2020
 7.2K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 8.8K     5 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 5.3K     0 

Infill Development Discussion

The question is...are there even any RCG properties in the city that have not already been/are currently being developed?

It was funny seeing council refuse the amendment to keep zoning based on approved LAPs...several said things like "we need a city-wide plan for this" without a hint of irony.
Maybe I'm misreading the comment but isn't that every property that a resident is just living in and not being actively re-developed? Which is most of the housing stock in the city.
How soon until Banker Daddy takes the funding away?
If they do that it's just bureaucracy run amuck. Judge cities on their results. We hit the target a year in advance, are one of the top performing communities in building housing, and now based on some rules people in Ottawa wrote, places that built less housing will be rewarded more than the city that built more housing. Rezoning is one aspect of it, but so is our speed of DP approval, availability of trades, heritage/design guidelines, all have an effect.

I also find the entire program doesn't align incentives properly. if you look at the city website on HAF, there's 9 initiatives, with only 1 that has any material benefit to residents, the community investment piece. I'm in favour of redevelopment, but if we want people to get onboard, shouldn't the answer be, if we build more housing, we'll get funds to invest in the community so services will keep up with population? Imagine a new pool with a big sign that it's built with HAF funding. Instead, we ask residents to rezone their property for more residents, so the city gets more money to build more housing? Affordable housing is good, but the way the program works, the incentives just doesn't make sense.

 
Maybe I'm misreading the comment but isn't that every property that a resident is just living in and not being actively re-developed? Which is most of the housing stock in the city.
I think as of August the only RCG properties in the city will be ones that:
- successfully applied for land-use redesignation to RCG before May 2024
- applied for a DP between May 2024 and Aug 2026

Everything else (that isn't new enough to be R-G) is reverting back to the various forms of R-1 and R-2. So presumably the previous RCG rules will remain in effect for any DPs already approved between now and the effective date. New RCG rules would only apply to anyone who did land-use before May 2024 and hasn't yet redeveloped (or for properties who will now go though the land-use redesignation public hearing process. Not sure what happens for active DPs that don't get fully approved before August?

It was a little funny to see council immediately run into the complexity and confusion of having like a dozen zoning categories for SFH/duplexes, with many councillors struggling to understand discretionary vs. permitted uses.
 
I think as of August the only RCG properties in the city will be ones that:
- successfully applied for land-use redesignation to RCG before May 2024
- applied for a DP between May 2024 and Aug 2026

Everything else (that isn't new enough to be R-G) is reverting back to the various forms of R-1 and R-2. So presumably the previous RCG rules will remain in effect for any DPs already approved between now and the effective date. New RCG rules would only apply to anyone who did land-use before May 2024 and hasn't yet redeveloped (or for properties who will now go though the land-use redesignation public hearing process. Not sure what happens for active DPs that don't get fully approved before August?

It was a little funny to see council immediately run into the complexity and confusion of having like a dozen zoning categories for SFH/duplexes, with many councillors struggling to understand discretionary vs. permitted uses.
Right, I misread your comment as talking about current housing, but you mean once the rezoning is fully repealed. I agree there's not many R-CG and I'd think all in-progress DP will be grandfathered with zoning when they applied. It's going to be pretty complicated to revert, taking into account all the applications that's happened since rezoning.

That's the problem when you have lots of first term councilors, that probably don't fully understand the bylaws they're passing.
 

Back
Top