adamyyc
Active Member
Nice!
Wow, everything screams NIMBYism. If this doesn't get approved, I'll be pretty mad. It's a beautiful simple building.This one is being appealed. SDAB2021-0091, link to plans and documents can be found here:
No new renderings from what I can see in the package. Reasons for appeal are as follows:Active Appeals / Public Reports
www.calgarysdab.ca
View attachment 373634
It's called living in a 1 million + high growth city. I don't get it, why not just move to the suburbs or Airdrie?Back yard view now. Still like the view? They have every right to file a complaint.
View attachment 374342
Back yard view now. Still like the view? They have every right to file a complaint.
View attachment 374342
Back yard view now. Still like the view? They have every right to file a complaint.
That tree blocks the "view" half the year anyway, terrible argument! hahaBack yard view now. Still like the view? They have every right to file a complaint.
View attachment 374342
I love how Sambo liked this post as if you were being seriousThey have every inch as much right to file a complaint as people on the internet have to say they're being shortsighted, selfish NIMBYs.
Here's the across-alley view that 19+2 took away, by the way:
View attachment 374408
But the residents in the $800K houses on the other side of the alley should absolutely complain, after all, they are providing the civic amenity that is this architecture:
View attachment 374409
Which we can all agree is a high quality urban space, and not the "boring/boxy design" of "alley facing walls" that would ruin the community.
And what was the view from your backyard before? The Hollywood Hills? Or was it perhaps the Grand Canyon?Back yard view now. Still like the view? They have every right to file a complaint.
View attachment 374342
They have every right to complain, but seems like one of those times when they are simply being whiners. I don’t have a problem with that view.Back yard view now. Still like the view? They have every right to file a complaint.
View attachment 374342