ActiveTruth
Active Member
Big city vibes
| NEWS | DATABASE | MAP | FORUM |  |  | SERVICES | UTPro | LOG IN | CITIES |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Oliver | 121.3m | 35s | Centron | Gibbs Gage
- Thread starter Surrealplaces
- Start date
1875
Senior Member
UrbanWarrior
Senior Member
Almost certainly either Oliver 1 and Oliver 2, or Oliver East and Oliver West. There would be little sense in naming an identical twin tower complex different names, no development in this city has done that, Office or residential.
UrbanRED
Active Member
Aura + The Arch? I suppose some people still refer to them as Aura I + Aura II
Cyric
Active Member
The second one will be Olivér to make it sound exotic.
1875
Senior Member
stan
haltcatchfire
Senior Member
They could go with Olivia.
Mind you, does that then cause some outrage because it feels heterosexual exclusive? Or maybe incestuous by better odds.
Mind you, does that then cause some outrage because it feels heterosexual exclusive? Or maybe incestuous by better odds.
GoVertical
Senior Member
Last edited:
gsunnyg
Senior Member
That’s it I’m triggered!
MichaelS
Senior Member
The River West complex where I used to live has towers named MacLeod and Barclay. But I guess the overall complex name of Riverwest negates that.
UrbanWarrior
Senior Member
dazzlingdave88
Active Member
OLIVER and OLIV3R (backwards E in the place of the 3, I just can't figure out how to do that on here.)
This is a wild guess based on their signage on site. Haha
This is a wild guess based on their signage on site. Haha
Beltline_B
Senior Member
I have to say I am thrilled with the way the podium has turned out. Talk about a massive win on the pedestrian/underpass side of things. I’m even more happy to see that the second tower is going up and I’m hoping will see the same sort of treatment on the 5th Street side.
Beltline_B
Senior Member
All joking aside, Oliver, and Olivia would be fine by me.
Alex_YYC
Senior Member
It’s not the worst idea I’ve heard
