It is Farkas' to lose, he's had a bit of a change of heart since last election and seems to have at least tried to open his mind. I'm still very skeptical. I do appreciate the people running as independents and will not be voting for anyone is part of a party. I got my first bit of literature on my door for an independent candidate in Ward 8, Nathanial Schmidt, I like who I see but as is the cast with most the literature and his website lack any real specifics but it is tough as an individual councilor to really promise anything other than some general direction you will vote. Nate, not sure he actually goes by that, also has the most signs by far up around the area.
His priorities are:
Build better housing options across the city
Increase investment in inner city neighbourhoods
Advocate for better infrastructure and public services
Create a safe and resilient city for everyone
Like I said very vague and the last two priorities can really mean anything. Infrastructure is everything from a curb to watermain. Also what does better mean, how is that measured? Better public service is also quite broad, is there something the City isn't doing it should be or is there something the City could do better. How is that measured?
I'm going to email Nate and see if he gets back with anything more specific, because a safe and resilient city for everyone sounds good but it doesn't mean anything. It could be safe-injection sites, not enforcing laws by the book on vulnerable people or it could mean zero tolerance for public drug use and arresting anyone causing the slightest bit of public disturbance.