Mountain Man
Senior Member
From street level the podium will look quite cool I think. The awkward massing of the tower may be a nod to Mount Royal House across the street! lol. Will definitely look great compared to it's neighbours!
The location is a little weird. Sure its on 1st Street, just up from a vibrant block, and on 10th Ave close to Greta and the cluster of places just to the west, but there are also so many parking lots right around here. They obviously don't own any of those lots and that's really what's happening here, its sad. If only the city made owning a surface parking lot less desirable than actually doing something with it.If they build it reasonably close to the render, and they do it quick enough, I'll consider eating my words.
Until then - this should be on a parking lot and not demolishing a historic building.
Funny idea: Make parking in surface parking lots free for RVs, camper vans, etc. Grandfather it in to sites designated as surface parking. The land owners will be outraged but I think people would go for it and the little guy might actually get a win over 'big parking'The location is a little weird. Sure its on 1st Street, just up from a vibrant block, and on 10th Ave close to Greta and the cluster of places just to the west, but there are also so many parking lots right around here. They obviously don't own any of those lots and that's really what's happening here, its sad. If only the city made owning a surface parking lot less desirable than actually doing something with it.
I wasn't being serious, no way you could or would ever want to do that.You guys have some interesting ideas, but mandating the use of private property is a slippery slope and I really don't want the city to open that door. The parking lots will develop when there is pressure on them to do so, trying to force them is something I don't want our local government to do. Private property is just that, trying to force a use on it the owner doesn't want is a really, really bad idea. Besides, all the lots that existed before any policy change would be grandfathered in under the old rules anyway.
The city always has the option to give incentives for other uses besides an empty lot.I wasn't being serious, no way you could or would ever want to do that.
Although maybe something to consider on city surface lots?
Tax break to get the mod'd Mercedes vans downtown (carrot rather than the stick), now we're getting somewhere!The city always has the option to give incentives for other uses besides an empty lot.
Maybe give a tax break if they turn it into a basketball court or something like an RV lot as you had mentioned.