News   Apr 03, 2020
 6.7K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 8.2K     5 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 4.8K     0 

Calgary & Alberta Economy

I've always thought Fortress could use a gondola to access the base like Sunshine. It would cut 18kms off the drive, half of which is slow and windy (wine-dee). Would need to expand the Lillian Lakes parking lot quite a bit.

Fortress scenery is quite good even at the base.


Screenshot 2025-12-10 at 11.23.26 AM.png



There's also really good opportunity to build a MUP along HWY 40; there's already a utility ROW cut through. Bike from the village to gondola, ride down the access road and back to village would be a pretty awesome circuit, but probably a little too long for the average tourist.
 
Nakiska could make it work with the Kananaskis Village right there, capture some of the tourists who want to take a chairlift to see the view, Louise and Sunshine currently do this in the summer. Kananaskis Village is a little underwhelming, they should try to improve that area to take some of the crowds from Banff. Castle area is already busy in the summer, not sure if taking one of their sketchy chairlifts would appeal to people. They have the old Angel Chair from Sunshine in their former cat ski area, haven't been there to see what it's like, definitely on my list this winter. Castle is also the only one that actually has MTB on the books, just need a few million to go in there and start building trails.


For Fortress I'd have to disagree, that's the one mountain where you could take the chair to access some very good climbing zones (The Fortress Itself). Nakiska pretty much goes to the top, not sure if there is anything on the ridge that's worth climbing past the top of the gold chair. Same with Castle, you already go very close to the top there.

Is there provincial money going to this? saying we want it is all well and good, but someone needs to put up some funds to make it happen.
The Fortress itself is good for climbing, but climbing ≠ mountaineering. I've done The Fortress numerous times, it's just a scramble. That's why I feel like they just threw in "mountaineering" as filler.
 
The Fortress itself is good for climbing, but climbing ≠ mountaineering. I've done The Fortress numerous times, it's just a scramble. That's why I feel like they just threw in "mountaineering" as filler.
Anyone know of any good literature out there that quantifies the tourism dollars derived from various recreational pursuits? I'm thinking skiing and hiking (and golf for that matter) would be on the higher side because they appeal to a broad base including rich older folks, whereas climbing/mountaineering/mountain biking are a younger man's game and have a much higher proportion of bums (I'm using that term affectionately).
 
Anyone know of any good literature out there that quantifies the tourism dollars derived from various recreational pursuits? I'm thinking skiing and hiking (and golf for that matter) would be on the higher side because they appeal to a broad base including rich older folks, whereas climbing/mountaineering/mountain biking are a younger man's game and have a much higher proportion of bums (I'm using that term affectionately).
I've never seen any exact reports or statistics before on that for Alberta, but I'd be interested in seeing it as well if it's public (or has even been researched heavily before).
I'd also assume skiing and golf would have the highest economic impact/would generate the most revenue as you require infrastructure to do so, compared to hiking, climbing, or mountain biking where all you need is a parks pass, if anything. Hikers are also more likely to stay in a campground whereas someone who's skiing or golfing is probably in a hotel, eating at restaurants, etc which does also generate a lot of revenue comparatively.
 
The Fortress itself is good for climbing, but climbing ≠ mountaineering. I've done The Fortress numerous times, it's just a scramble. That's why I feel like they just threw in "mountaineering" as filler.
Is there a section they could put a via ferrata or something? The Fortress looks like a gnarly mountain, but I'm no climber, I prefer taking a chairlift up then riding down on a snowboard or bike lol.

I think mountain biking would be somewhere between golf / snowboarding and hiking in terms of generated revenue. The biking I'm talking about is lift access mountain biking like they do at all the BC hills, those would be hotel / chalet stays and would contribute to the nightlife. If whatever hill does this landed a world cup spot (or some other high profile event) that would put it very close to the same level as winter operations.
 
Is there a section they could put a via ferrata or something? The Fortress looks like a gnarly mountain, but I'm no climber, I prefer taking a chairlift up then riding down on a snowboard or bike lol.
I'm sure they could make something work on the north side of the mountain. It looks like there's already a route which goes from the cat skiing lodge to Fortress Lake on the NW boundary of the ski area, they could do a via ferrata up/along the cirque of The Fortress/Gusty Peak there.... however it's just barely outside of the ski area so it's probably not going to be considered by the province. The Fortress Southern Outlier is a little to the south and is on the boundary of the ski area, they could do a via ferrata on the NE-facing side there which is probably a little more realistic.

Would be great to see anything get put in there but my gut says this is just another announcement to get people excited and that the actual outcome will probably just be getting the lifts running again and maybe some downhill biking infrastructure for summers. But I hope I'm wrong.
 

Back
Top