News   Apr 03, 2020
 7.3K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 8.9K     5 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 5.3K     0 

Calgary & Alberta Economy

If Calgary decides to pursue a bid for the 2038 Winter Olympics, it would be a boost for the aging facilities that supported the Olympics nearly five decades ago.

“If we are going to invest in things that we need anyway — like an LRT connection to the airport, a new McMahon Stadium — it makes sense for us to at least be having a conversation around a future Olympic bid,” Farkas said.

“When I look at the ideal timing, it may make sense for it to be a 50th anniversary bid.”

Although the city has several infrastructure needs that need to be addressed, Farkas said the city should be ambitious.

“If the community were to support a bid through a plebiscite and do the heavy lifting, I think that you would have the politicians on board,” he said.
“But I really do believe that a strong business case could show Calgarians that an Olympic bid is how we address the infrastructure needs here locally.”


I hope we end up making a bid for 2038. There's funding issues for a variety of facilities including the oval. As the Olympics move towards a less competitive process, and more and more cities unable to host the winter games, bringing our facilities up to date may give us the games every 4/5 cycles, rather than all the expense for one games. Not to mention the associated World Championships, etc.
 
Alberta looking at Northern route (shorter shipping distance, cheaper construction, deeper port=bigger ships) but with the main hurdles being tanker ban and indigenous opposition. I think we'll get a pipeline, but will have to compromise to the Southern route. A northern pipeline will be a generational project though.

 
So much being known about the southern route reduces risk by a lot. Sure there are tight points which will require lots of work to go around, but tunnels while more expensive up front are cheaper than trying to run directional drilling 3 times and failing or other misadventures south south of Kamloops which led to the last expansion in that section being more than 10x over estimate iirc.

Ask TC about how much better the more optimal route of Keystone XL was over the more expensive option of twinning Keystone.
 
Good to see this finally move forward
I know nothing about this... but in the context of another west coast pipeline, could you build a pipeline to storage tanks somewhere near here and build another terminal? Seems better than another terminal more inland.
 
I know nothing about this... but in the context of another west coast pipeline, could you build a pipeline to storage tanks somewhere near here and build another terminal?
Yes. Was studied as part of the TMX project and rejected as it added more pipeline, and the capacity wasn't worth the for the incremental amount of export expected (none). The coal facility doesn't need as much land as it once did. Part of it has been repurposed as a potash facility in the mean time. An oil facility would require less land than was repurposed for the potash terminal.

From memory (and I don't recall if this made it into the public report, or was a friend pulling it up and sharing during the friendly lunch), 2 1 million barrel tanks, a receiving and pumping station, a containment berm (to limit the size, it had to be engineered--to contain 2 million barrels from 2 failed tanks, it needed to be 5m tall), 1 VLCC loading berth:
1777059740973.png


It also requires a storage location whereever the lateral to Roberts Bank starts. I think it was Sumas up the hill a bit where a pumping station is already close by? 10 million barrels of working storage to allow assembly of loads from lumpy batching coming down the line.
 
Yes. Was studied as part of the TMX project and rejected as it added more pipeline, and the capacity wasn't worth the for the incremental amount of export expected (none). The coal facility doesn't need as much land as it once did. Part of it has been repurposed as a potash facility in the mean time. An oil facility would require less land than was repurposed for the potash terminal.

From memory (and I don't recall if this made it into the public report, or was a friend pulling it up and sharing during the friendly lunch), 2 1 million barrel tanks, a receiving and pumping station, a containment berm (to limit the size, it had to be engineered--to contain 2 million barrels from 2 failed tanks, it needed to be 5m tall), 1 VLCC loading berth:
View attachment 731840

It also requires a storage location whereever the lateral to Roberts Bank starts. I think it was Sumas up the hill a bit where a pumping station is already close by? 10 million barrels of working storage to allow assembly of loads from lumpy batching coming down the line.
Well Mark... We're waiting...
 

Back
Top