trtcttc
Senior Member
Especially making it free for all. Many places have discounted rates for local residents, but to not collect those tourism dollars doesn't make sense.
Alberta looking at Northern route (shorter shipping distance, cheaper construction, deeper port=bigger ships) but with the main hurdles being tanker ban and indigenous opposition. I think we'll get a pipeline, but will have to compromise to the Southern route. A northern pipeline will be a generational project though.![]()
Ottawa looking to new pipeline route from Alberta to Southern B.C.
According to sources in The Globe and Mail, the federal government is targeting a new route for a West Coast pipeline through Southern British Columbia.www.westernstandard.news
I know nothing about this... but in the context of another west coast pipeline, could you build a pipeline to storage tanks somewhere near here and build another terminal? Seems better than another terminal more inland.Good to see this finally move forward
![]()
Battle over Metro Vancouver superport expansion ends in surprise alliance | Daily Hive | Urbanized
After years of disagreement, Vancouver Fraser Port Authority and GCT Global Containers are working together on Roberts Bank Terminal 2.dailyhive.com
Yes. Was studied as part of the TMX project and rejected as it added more pipeline, and the capacity wasn't worth the for the incremental amount of export expected (none). The coal facility doesn't need as much land as it once did. Part of it has been repurposed as a potash facility in the mean time. An oil facility would require less land than was repurposed for the potash terminal.I know nothing about this... but in the context of another west coast pipeline, could you build a pipeline to storage tanks somewhere near here and build another terminal?
Well Mark... We're waiting...Yes. Was studied as part of the TMX project and rejected as it added more pipeline, and the capacity wasn't worth the for the incremental amount of export expected (none). The coal facility doesn't need as much land as it once did. Part of it has been repurposed as a potash facility in the mean time. An oil facility would require less land than was repurposed for the potash terminal.
From memory (and I don't recall if this made it into the public report, or was a friend pulling it up and sharing during the friendly lunch), 2 1 million barrel tanks, a receiving and pumping station, a containment berm (to limit the size, it had to be engineered--to contain 2 million barrels from 2 failed tanks, it needed to be 5m tall), 1 VLCC loading berth:
View attachment 731840
It also requires a storage location whereever the lateral to Roberts Bank starts. I think it was Sumas up the hill a bit where a pumping station is already close by? 10 million barrels of working storage to allow assembly of loads from lumpy batching coming down the line.
The Alberta government is slowly coming to the realization that this is the project. The feds are already there. The BC province is okay with it.Well Mark... We're waiting...




