darwink
Senior Member
I suspect a combination of value engineering and keeping options open for a future phase led to this decision.I wonder why they flipped the design. In the original render the new addition was on the same side as the river. Now they placed it on the side of the train and turned the river side into a park. Can’t say I hate the change, but I did like the new glass addition fronting the river. Would have made for some nice river views from inside. I also notice that the new addition seems smaller than what was originally planned. Oh well, I’ll take it and it should be a nice addition to the west end.
All said, I am surprised this went as far as being on DMAP. How long do approvals live again? Once renewed?
There isn’t evidence I’ve seen that they have a funding agreement for this, but perhaps things are percolating.