News   Apr 03, 2020
 6.8K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 8.4K     5 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 4.9K     0 

Recent content by MichaelS

  1. MichaelS

    Urban Development and Proposals Discussion

    Nice. I take it this is the former Sola site: https://calgary.skyrisecities.com/forum/threads/calgary-sola-26-21m-9s-ocgrow-riddell-kurczaba.29875/ It is great to see Porte going all in for Calgary. They have purchased a couple of the Sarina ones in Marda Loop I think, and have 3 development...
  2. MichaelS

    Porte Hillhurst | 21m | 6s | Porte | CTZN

    Nice. I take it this is the former Sola site: https://calgary.skyrisecities.com/forum/threads/calgary-sola-26-21m-9s-ocgrow-riddell-kurczaba.29875/ It is great to see Porte going all in for Calgary. They have purchased a couple of the Sarina ones in Marda Loop I think, and have 3 development...
  3. MichaelS

    Northland Village Redevelopment | 19m | 6s | DIALOG

    Primaris has sold the mall. We will see if there is any further redevelopment with the new owners. https://renx.ca/primaris-sells-calgarys-northland-site-for-154-million
  4. MichaelS

    17th Ave Mixed Use | 23m | 6s | Porte | Gravity Architecture

    Saw this on Linkedin: From Gravity's website, here are few other renderings: https://www.gravityarchitecture.com/17th-ave-mixed-use
  5. MichaelS

    West District | ?m | ?s | Truman

    https://www.ymcacalgary.org/blog/calgary-city-council-funds-design-and-planning-proposed-west-district-ymca-and-library More details about the YMCA.
  6. MichaelS

    906 Office Conversion | 80.5m | 22s | Makan Properties | Zeidler

    The applicants were asked about that at CPC. I can't remember their answers, made it sounds as if the existing office building and structure would make that rather difficult. It is an interesting conundrum. The rules are clear in the ARP, adminstration even offered compromises, but in the end...
  7. MichaelS

    906 Office Conversion | 80.5m | 22s | Makan Properties | Zeidler

    The ultimate decision is up to Council. CPC just makes recommendations on land use. Also, this was discussed in this project's thread: https://skyrisecities.com/forum/threads/calgary-906-office-conversion-80-5m-22s-makan-properties-zeidler.38375/page-5
  8. MichaelS

    906 Office Conversion | 80.5m | 22s | Makan Properties | Zeidler

    Interesting. CPC voted 5-4 to recommend refusal of this land use to Council. This is in line with Administrations recommendations. The reasons are outlined in the report: We will see what happens when it goes to the public hearing.
  9. MichaelS

    Urban Development and Proposals Discussion

    To be clear, I don't think Quantum Place is the developer, they are the planning consultant. And actually, they are winding down operation in the new year (founder got a new job with an international developer). I imagine they will continue to take this land use redesigntation through to...
  10. MichaelS

    Broadway on 17th | 154m | 47s | Vesta | Zeidler

    Unanimously approved by CPC.
  11. MichaelS

    Urban Development and Proposals Discussion

    An interesting land use application over by SAIT: https://dmap.calgary.ca/?p=LOC2025-0239 It is just land use right now, no DP. Quantum Place (the planning consultant) has an engagement page up for the project, including a potential building massing...
  12. MichaelS

    Block 11B | 18m | 5s | Luxuria | Gravity Architecture

    Another article on this project (both townhomes and apartments): https://renxhomes.ca/luxuria-build-homes-cadence-vanguard-calgary-university-district
  13. MichaelS

    Urban Development and Proposals Discussion

    https://calgary.skyrisecities.com/forum/threads/calgary-the-grid-23m-6s-eagle-crest-faas-architecture.28213/ Thread for The Grid.
  14. MichaelS

    Riverside Village | 86m | 27s | CNIB | S2

    Interloq Capital. Former Mayor Bronconnier's firm.
  15. MichaelS

    Statscan numbers

    This is insane to me. I mean, I get that Alberta is a great place to live, but what is going on with the rest of Canada? Surely this is sparking some serious conversations within our federal government about funding allocation?

Back
Top