trtcttc
Senior Member
With the Green Line board disbanded and I think the CEO of the project left, whose running this thing? Is everything going to be voted on by council?
With the Green Line board disbanded and I think the CEO of the project left, whose running this thing? Is everything going to be voted on by council?
I would love if they would run that thing into the side of the hill, Edmonton LRT style, and emerge just north of 20 Ave N. One can dream.I am wondering, would having the station at Eau Claire above ground rather than transitioning from a tunnel to a bridge so abruptly reduce the cost of the bridge structure across the river? I assume it would make for a less challenging structure from an engineering perspective?
If elevated is off the table, its optimal imo. Becomes a bit of an optimization problem, trying to keep the distance down between the tunnel portal and the southern most edge of the station box, so that an emergency staircase and smoke extraction isn't needed in between. At 16th, station designs optimization becomes about underground cost versus land purchases required--too strong of a mandate to not purchase more land, and underground expensive choices need to be made.I would love if they would run that thing into the side of the hill, Edmonton LRT style, and emerge just north of 20 Ave N. One can dream.
The Crescent Heights Village BIA has been campaigning for a change to Centre St south of 16th Ave for years. Whether it comes from surface running Green Line, dedicated bus lanes or just a simple road diet, the businesses of that area appear to feel strongly that the current car sewer status quo with the lane reversals is actually the worst possible case for businesses along that stretch.Running the line at grade on Centre St to 16th would be devastating for the businesses along that stretch.
Exactly. Running the train at grade would likely make the area much more pedestrian friendly by significantly reducing traffic and shortening crossing distances, as long as they design it to have pedestrian crossings at every avenue. The way it is right now, if you want to go to two businesses right across the street from each other you may have to walk 2 or 3 blocks north or south to find a controlled intersection to safely cross at!The Crescent Heights Village BIA has been campaigning for a change to Centre St south of 16th Ave for years. Whether it comes from surface running Green Line, dedicated bus lanes or just a simple road diet, the businesses of that area appear to feel strongly that the current car sewer status quo with the lane reversals is actually the worst possible case for businesses along that stretch.
It would be hard to do worse than the current streetscape, Centre Street south of 16th Avenue is one of Calgary's best stretches of road as an example of the totally cavalier and uncoordinated lane width decisions that go on silently over the years, effective acting like a decades long process of erosion on the curb, slowly making everything worse for every road user.Exactly. Running the train at grade would likely make the area much more pedestrian friendly by significantly reducing traffic and shortening crossing distances, as long as they design it to have pedestrian crossings at every avenue. The way it is right now, if you want to go to two businesses right across the street from each other you may have to walk 2 or 3 blocks north or south to find a controlled intersection to safely cross at!
This could be said for any of the city's stroads. None of which are actually targeted for "Main Street" work. Our actual Main Streets are almost all too far gone for any structurally planned and effective fix. When I say this I think of 16th Ave, Centre St N, 4th Ave, 5th Ave, 6th Ave, 9th Ave, 11th Ave, 12th Ave, Macleod Trail, Elbow Drive.the thing that really needs to clean up is the largely invisible processes and decision frameworks that created the current mess