News   Apr 03, 2020
 6.3K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 7.9K     4 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 4.7K     0 

Calgary Transit

Shaganappi Trail Transit study is progressing. Proposed stations for the BRT:

Shag_Alignment_Station_v2.png
 
Shaganappi Trail Transit study is progressing. Proposed stations for the BRT:

Buddy of mine from college who interned for UCPG and said the parking lanes in University District will be converted to a future BRT, I wonder if this project will see that finally done? This was back in 2022 so I am not sure if that is still the plan.
 
Shaganappi Trail Transit study is progressing. Proposed stations for the BRT:
Are they going to add BRT lanes that cut into the communities or something? Several of those stops are at the intersection of major roads with that are 100-200m away from any houses. Hard to imagine a stop that's easy to get to or pleasant to wait at here:
1754424597613.png


Or here:
1754424663106.png
 
Looks like the plan is to build a busway adjacent to Market Street where the future Greenline is going to go. I assume they have to demolish the busway to install the tracks for the Greenline? If that's the case, it sounds like kind of a waste of resources. It's probably better to just terminate the bus line at the front of the hospital.

1754443915345.png
 
Looks like the plan is to build a busway adjacent to Market Street where the future Greenline is going to go. I assume they have to demolish the busway to install the tracks for the Greenline? If that's the case, it sounds like kind of a waste of resources. It's probably better to just terminate the bus line at the front of the hospital.

View attachment 671335
It's probably a way for them to build a bus loop at Seton station to have capacity for feeders. A two lane road paved on top of the alignment won't be too wasteful especially if they design the utilities to be converted
 
It really has changed the whole vibe in the area. The level crossing at 17th Ave has been a game changer too.
Soon there will be three ways to access the station, when the controlled intersection is completed at 15th Ave SE/McLeod
 
Listened to a podcast about free transit. I find their opinions a bit extreme at times but appreciate their perspective. There was a line that I found interesting, free transit doesn't actually move a lot of people out of their cars because if you can afford to drive you can afford to drive. What it does is get people biking and walking to take transit instead. This made a lot of sense to me, especially when thinking about the colder months of the year.

The podcast covered a few other things that can make buses faster and better. It had me considering things like what is better fewer stops but more people getting on that those fewer stops causing longer dwell time that doesn't necessarily speed up the bus. Fewer stops also makes the bus a little less convenient, I'm willing to walk 15 minutes to a MAX stop but a lot of people are not. I do like the idea of all-door loading, it wouldn't be that hard to put a scanner at the back door of a bus, especially the BRT, MAX and Accordion buses. Obviously the best thing you can do for bus service is bus lanes and bus priority at lights, I'd love to see a consideration of bike lanes and bus lanes on certain roads coupled together. As a cyclist I would appreciate riding on the left side of a bus lane, I know there are not going to be any doors opening in front of me, the bus will go in a straight line and not cut across the lane like a parked or merging car would. I think this could work on 5th, 6th and 9th Avenues, and Centre and 1st Street SW downtown.

 
Listened to a podcast about free transit. I find their opinions a bit extreme at times but appreciate their perspective. There was a line that I found interesting, free transit doesn't actually move a lot of people out of their cars because if you can afford to drive you can afford to drive. What it does is get people biking and walking to take transit instead. This made a lot of sense to me, especially when thinking about the colder months of the year.

The podcast covered a few other things that can make buses faster and better. It had me considering things like what is better fewer stops but more people getting on that those fewer stops causing longer dwell time that doesn't necessarily speed up the bus. Fewer stops also makes the bus a little less convenient, I'm willing to walk 15 minutes to a MAX stop but a lot of people are not. I do like the idea of all-door loading, it wouldn't be that hard to put a scanner at the back door of a bus, especially the BRT, MAX and Accordion buses. Obviously the best thing you can do for bus service is bus lanes and bus priority at lights, I'd love to see a consideration of bike lanes and bus lanes on certain roads coupled together. As a cyclist I would appreciate riding on the left side of a bus lane, I know there are not going to be any doors opening in front of me, the bus will go in a straight line and not cut across the lane like a parked or merging car would. I think this could work on 5th, 6th and 9th Avenues, and Centre and 1st Street SW downtown.

I think a distance based fare would also help with walking/biking vs transit. It seems odd that taking the train from downtown to Sunnyside is the same as taking it to Tuscany, which means people are likely going to resist taking it one stop and just walk.
I think part of the savings for fewer stops is mainly for routes on arterial roads. Some of them meander into neighborhoods, which causes a lot of extra driving to pick up few people. At the same time, some of those people need transit the most and moving a stop 100m for a senior is a lot. The way around this is to keep some of these neighbourhood routes active, but reduce frequency and ramp up our Max service, and not building stations but increasing service, so some of these routes can be used without looking at a schedule before you depart.
I don't think a bike lane on the left of a bus is ideal, Most streets have turning traffic and with the bus blocking so much view, there's bound to be drivers that miss cyclists and likely increase collisions.
 
It seems odd that taking the train from downtown to Sunnyside is the same as taking it to Tuscany, which means people are likely going to resist taking it one stop and just walk.
It makes sense when you think about choke points and capacity constraints. For LRT in Calgary you could change the fares to make the LRT system free as long as you're not passing on bridges, tunnels, or viaducts immediately adjacent to downtown, and the system would work fine. Maybe fares for inbound for the hour of peak.
 

Back
Top