News   Apr 03, 2020
 6.3K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 7.8K     3 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 4.6K     0 

Urban Development and Proposals Discussion

Listening to "all these stupid voices" is a Canadian pastime, and why it's hard/expensive/time-consuming to build anything. And it's probably worse the bigger the stage. It's all a balancing act in a democracy, but imagine trying to build the trans Canadian railroad today? Unpossible!
It’s a Canadian/Anglo thing to be sure. However these endless engagements that frankly only give voice to the frankly uninformed it is just performative and have nothing to do with democracy. Canada doesn’t have a direct democracy, we elect those to make decisions. They need to stop wasting time and money. If you want to have a direct democracy then that’s great, but we’ll have to make our education a lot better.
 
Honestly I have no idea why Canada gives so much power to NIMBYs.

Is it legally required to have all these stupid voices heard, or is it just something that’s been done for a while?

Other places I’ve lived, communities have a certain degree of input, tweaks here and there, how to increase green space/parks etc, but the overall design they have no say over nor any power to kill a development.

Yes, it's a legal requirement coming down from Alberta's Municipal Government Act that we are to conduct proper community engagement and hold a public hearing for any modification to statutory plans like the Land Use Bylaw.

Manitoba changed this requirement recently, requiring some threshold of signatures before a public hearing is required, something like a few dozen, or a couple hundred for Winnipeg.

I should add that there is no requirement to do these things lot-by-lot, or reactively. We rezoned the entire city with one big public hearing, which saved a lot of time from doing thousands of tiny ones.

There's also no legal requirement for journalists to bias their coverage of housing issues so radically toward one side, but it generates more outrage and thus ad revenue.
 
Yes, it's a legal requirement coming down from Alberta's Municipal Government Act that we are to conduct proper community engagement and hold a public hearing for any modification to statutory plans like the Land Use Bylaw.

Manitoba changed this requirement recently, requiring some threshold of signatures before a public hearing is required, something like a few dozen, or a couple hundred for Winnipeg.

I should add that there is no requirement to do these things lot-by-lot, or reactively. We rezoned the entire city with one big public hearing, which saved a lot of time from doing thousands of tiny ones.

There's also no legal requirement for journalists to bias their coverage of housing issues so radically toward one side, but it generates more outrage and thus ad revenue.
I see. That’s unfortunate, that requirement needs to be stripped. It’s a waste of resources and time.
 
I suspect there is a sweet spot age for empty-nesters to downsize, but once they cross a certain threshold (probably a little over 70) then they are likely staying put until assisted-living is necessary.
There's probably also a lack of desirable homes to downsize too. The popular older person home is the medium size bungalow that has everything they need on the ground floor and usable yards to garden. But that's only really found in old suburbs, they don't really exist in new communities due to lot cost and size. And even for old bungalows, they're the frequent target of redevelopment because of their large, wide lots.

Meanwhile townhomes/rowhomes have too many stairs, a lot of people don't like condos in general, and people still remember the horror stories of senior living facilities during COVID.
 
a lot of people don't like condos in general
This is a required shift that I'm not exactly sure how to initiate. Personally, I cannot believe the fees that some buildings charge. It was cheaper per month for my wife and I to buy a duplex in Marda Loop than a decent size condo simply because of the condo fees.
 
This is a required shift that I'm not exactly sure how to initiate. Personally, I cannot believe the fees that some buildings charge. It was cheaper per month for my wife and I to buy a duplex in Marda Loop than a decent size condo simply because of the condo fees.
I've also heard horror stories about the fees going through the roof if any structural issues or expensive repairs are required on a condo building. Some of the older downtown condos charge fees that are nearly as high as the mortgage would be. From an investment perspective, I hear that initial buyers in East Village have property values that are still underwater.
 
Ideally you want something that can nicely go from 10,000 to 30,000 seat capacity.

The lower end being for Cavalry and Wild. The higher end being for Grey Cup, a big soccer match, outdoor NHL game and a big concert which would actually have higher capacity because you can use the field.

There are a lot of simple designs out there that can be pretty basic, which is all we need. Best comparisons are probably MLS stadiums...

Cincinnati
26,000 Seats
Opened May 16, 2021
Construction cost $250 million (343.75 million Canadian)
View attachment 666756

St. Louis
22,423 Seats
Opened November 16, 2022
Construction cost $457.8 million (629.48 million Canadian)
View attachment 666755

Austin
20,500 Seats
Opened June 16, 2021
Construction cost $260 million (357.50 million Canadian)
View attachment 666754

Columbus
20,371 Seats
Opened July 3, 2021
Construction cost $314 million (431.75 million Canadian)
View attachment 666753

So with a 2025 budget of $500 million Canadian you could probably get something like one of these. You could probably cut out a lot of bells and whistles (roof, permanent amenities, etc.) to maybe get it to $350 million Canadian. That doesn't seem crazy expensive to me. Especially if you put a bubble on it and call it a community recreation space from Mid-November to Mid-April.
So... Vancouver is looking at building a Stadium for the Whitecaps. Looks like it could be near the PNE, with this and the amphitheatre we should just copy paste and edit just enough we don't get sued for copywrite.

 
Last edited:
What's the plan for the Cavalry? are they going to expand their presence at Spruce Meadows? I really do think we should have an indoor stadium for soccer, too high of a chance of hosting international events during winter. Ideally I would love a stadium with a retractable roof for football and soccer, not likely to happen in my lifetime though. Can CFL and CPL share a stadium, CFL don't usually play on grass and soccer prefer it.
 
1753718574857.png
New DP for a cool little multi project just submitted for 1730 and 1732 12 AV SW in Sunalta. Surprisingly they pack 41 units into this project, all studios and 1 bedroom! Architect is MC+A. I'm a big fan of these smaller floorplate 6-storey projects. Note, they are proposing no parking so it could be a very quick build if all goes well.
 
What's the plan for the Cavalry? are they going to expand their presence at Spruce Meadows? I really do think we should have an indoor stadium for soccer, too high of a chance of hosting international events during winter. Ideally I would love a stadium with a retractable roof for football and soccer, not likely to happen in my lifetime though. Can CFL and CPL share a stadium, CFL don't usually play on grass and soccer prefer it.
The new Spruce Meadows area structure plan outlines that at some point in the next 30 years the Canada ring will be replaced by a new 12k soccer specific stadium.
 
We've seen clearly that Ontario and BC haven't ramped in response the way Alberta has, despite higher prices. Canada as a whole produces fewer units than in the 70s, on a much larger base. If the entire country built like Alberta, there wouldn't be a housing crisis. Things can't turn on a dime. but two things, they should change over the course of a decade and it is clear there is a culture reason the anglo countries are clustered together. Sure Houston or Calgary would have a different place on the chart, but that is despite the culture around land use and a continual fight.
Doesn't that chart show we're building more per 1000 people than 10 years ago? So we are building more after accounting for population change. If we hold population steady, our pace of building has really increased. Comparisons to the post-war periods aren't really useful. The Yonge street subway was built in 5 years. Some of that is political or contracting issues, but part of that is also more stringent safety regulation and other positive things.
There's probably also a lack of desirable homes to downsize too. The popular older person home is the medium size bungalow that has everything they need on the ground floor and usable yards to garden. But that's only really found in old suburbs, they don't really exist in new communities due to lot cost and size. And even for old bungalows, they're the frequent target of redevelopment because of their large, wide lots.

Meanwhile townhomes/rowhomes have too many stairs, a lot of people don't like condos in general, and people still remember the horror stories of senior living facilities during COVID.
There's a segment of the population that want to downsize and there's condos built for that in places like Mahogany and University District. Condos over 1000 sq ft, close to $1M dollars, and concrete build. Alberta is actually a bit better, but in places like BC and ON where the issue is probably much more acute, there's sizable transaction costs. Even if someone was ok to move to a condo or something smaller, they'd need to lose $200k in taxes/agent fees/lawyers/etc. that it ends up not being worth it.
 
So... Vancouver is looking at building a Stadium for the Whitecaps. Looks like it could be near the PNE, with this and the amphitheatre we should just copy paste and edit just enough we don't get sued for copywrite.

Another city and province getting bullied into building a new stadium. And it just happens to coincide with the ownership group looking to sell and the Whitecaps among the 3 lowest valued team in the MLS. Guarantee the new owners will threaten to leave to force a new stadium. It's nice to see sports leagues grow, but a really sad part of professional sports is how corporate it's become. Every team needs their own unique stadium filled maximally with suites. It's not as big of an issue in Canada as the US where some cities have an incredible amount of stadium capacity. And unfortunately if Canada wants to take part, we got to fork over public money for it too. I don't mind Scotia Place as the Saddledome was really showing it's age and had structural issues, but forcing a move out of BC Place is pretty unnecessary. Especially when the main "complaint" is scheduling due to upgrades needed for FIFA, which would obviously be done by next year.
 
The new Spruce Meadows area structure plan outlines that at some point in the next 30 years the Canada ring will be replaced by a new 12k soccer specific stadium.
This is from the ASP which is from 2020 so I'd take it with a grain of salt. Although the CPL seems to be here to stay so I would expect this plan to still be something they'd like to do.
1753722128814.png

For context on where the Canada Ring is.
1753722138590.png

Phasing is in Phase 3, "following phases one and two at the ten-year mark." So, 2030? I included the fieldhouse info as that will be for Cavalry too.
1753722151975.png
Screenshot 2025-07-28 105426.png

Some details...
Screenshot 2025-07-28 104821.png
Screenshot 2025-07-28 104956.png

Finally, a look at their vision.
Screenshot 2025-07-28 104447.png


Its realistic and they probably can do it privately. I don't see the Southern's being interested in pushing people off their site and towards somewhere else in the city. Outside of the stadium size, the stadium and fieldhouse facilities are exactly what the Stampeders need. I think CSEC should see if the Southern's are at all interested in the Stampeders... There's sufficient room to go from 12,000 to 24,000. Maybe the stadium would lose its intimacy but a good design at least mitigates that. And if any two sports can be sustained in the suburbs, one or two night a week sports like Soccer and Football can. The biggest issue is transit access. There is none. Maybe something could be figured out but if I'm the City I want Spruce Meadows within City limits. As part of the deal the City can adopt this or an updated plan. Personally, the synergies are there but I don't see it happening.
 
Another city and province getting bullied into building a new stadium. And it just happens to coincide with the ownership group looking to sell and the Whitecaps among the 3 lowest valued team in the MLS. Guarantee the new owners will threaten to leave to force a new stadium. It's nice to see sports leagues grow, but a really sad part of professional sports is how corporate it's become. Every team needs their own unique stadium filled maximally with suites. It's not as big of an issue in Canada as the US where some cities have an incredible amount of stadium capacity. And unfortunately if Canada wants to take part, we got to fork over public money for it too. I don't mind Scotia Place as the Saddledome was really showing it's age and had structural issues, but forcing a move out of BC Place is pretty unnecessary. Especially when the main "complaint" is scheduling due to upgrades needed for FIFA, which would obviously be done by next year.
Other than Toronto, outside of hockey, it really is a struggle for Canadian cities to keep their pro sports franchises when the US has dozens of cities willing to spend obscene amounts of taxpayer dollars for pro sports facilities.
 

Back
Top