These proposals are excellent, I never truly appreciated how much space is available in the neighbourhood for redevelopment. Bridgeland is a great neighbourhood with even greater potential. A close-in TOD site, walking and biking distance to everything, and largely underdeveloped. In 2016, Bridgeland had around ~6,000 residents, with this kind of scale project - and the other redevelopment projects - Bridgeland could be approaching the ~10,000 mark in the future.
I do wonder though how the neighbourhood might have evolved differently if the General Hospital remained? The site opened up the neighbourhood for redevelopment, but at the loss of a few thousands daily visitors and employees. It wasn't until the most recent boom - and it's particular return-to-the-city flair - that we are seeing substantive shifts in the population and activities there. I would like to think that Bridgeland was likely to have continued it's transition to a medium density urban neighbourhood regardless (as most central neighbourhoods have over the past decades), but with the added bonus of much more activity.
Of course, crying over the loss of a hospital is crying over two-decade old, provincially-induced spilt milk, but it would be interesting to imagine how things would have been different.
