Search results

I'm not referring to the money that was actually spent on something (some of that can be considered lost as well). According to the article there is nearly 1 billion in wind down cost.

The 1 Billion lost is equal to the money needed to extend the current plan to Shepard. We are going to spend basically the same amount to get something worse.

A one time saving of $1.8B, but now the train line doesn't go downtown, won't go to the north, and will overload the red and blue lines. You also need to take into account the long term costs of lower ridership on all three lines and the headache/costs of inevitably trying to fix it one day.

https://livewirecalgary.com/2024/05/09/green-line-cost-escalations-draw-further-scrutiny-by-alberta-government/ I saw there was actually some numbers in this old article: “It says that, it’s that area that’s going down to Eau Claire, and the alternative, an elevated line from the Event Center...

Not quite because you would also need to take into account the average riding going from 49000 to 58000. Not sure how to do the math off the top of my head.

If Calgary and Edmonton both grow by 300,000 people from 2017-2027 and each riding is about 50,000 people. Then it would make sense for both cities to get several new ridings.

This is another new one I believe. 58MW near Edmonton. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/shell-solar-farm-edmonton-alberta-1.6242314