News   Apr 03, 2020
 7.2K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 8.8K     5 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 5.3K     0 

Search results

  1. T

    Nay Development 24A | 24m | 6s | Nay Developments | CTZN

    Still not the Beltline <3
  2. T

    Nay Development 24A | 24m | 6s | Nay Developments | CTZN

    Ahh yes, that is actually a key distinction in this case. Killarney is not the Beltline. Hope this helps!
  3. T

    Nay Development 24A | 24m | 6s | Nay Developments | CTZN

    I’m all for being part of the solution. Nothing wrong with densifying and I do agree the area could use it. Thoughtful site planning is part of that. Ignoring real access constraints because we hope transit solves everything isn’t.
  4. T

    Nay Development 24A | 24m | 6s | Nay Developments | CTZN

    “Taking transit” doesn’t eliminate delivery trucks, garbage collection, emergency access, safety concerns or the reality of a single-lane alley that’s often blocked. Supporting density and asking for practical site planning aren’t mutually exclusive.
  5. T

    Nay Development 24A | 24m | 6s | Nay Developments | CTZN

    This would be in terribly close proximity to the already large Casel apartment building that is just across the single lane alleyway. Seems like an inappropriate place for such a large development when you consider traffic, emergency access, etc. Not to mention there are several huge and mature...

Back
Top