News   Apr 03, 2020
 6.6K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 8.2K     5 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 4.8K     0 

Alberta Provincial Politics

If an election was held today, who would you vote for?

  • UCP

    Votes: 9 13.6%
  • NDP

    Votes: 48 72.7%
  • Liberal

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Alberta Party

    Votes: 4 6.1%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 5 7.6%

  • Total voters
    66
The whole exercise was dumb, but at least the best one (other than the red letters one) was chosen

I'm just so glad they didn't pick the one with the cowboys on horses and the pumpjacks.
 
Meanwhile, the Globe and Mail just leaked that the UCP plans on making family doctors offer 2 streams of service (public and private for pay). Remember Danielle's promise that this wouldn't happen if we just voted for her?

Nenshi just challenged her to call an election as a referendum on this privatization scheme.
 
Meanwhile, the Globe and Mail just leaked that the UCP plans on making family doctors offer 2 streams of service (public and private for pay). Remember Danielle's promise that this wouldn't happen if we just voted for her?

Nenshi just challenged her to call an election as a referendum on this privatization scheme.
She's kind of busy using the NWC to skirt those pesky courts.
 
Meanwhile, the Globe and Mail just leaked that the UCP plans on making family doctors offer 2 streams of service (public and private for pay). Remember Danielle's promise that this wouldn't happen if we just voted for her?

Nenshi just challenged her to call an election as a referendum on this privatization scheme.
It is an option to participate in both streams, not a requirement. Quebec has had thus fir years, but for some reason the sky didn't fall
 
They are also much poorer and have administrative structures straight out of the 70s - hard to disaggregate what makes them worse, or whether it is a combination of all three.

Yeah you aren't kidding, they'd be the 6th poorest state in greater trumpmerica..

Fig2_GDPperCapita2024_graph_v1.jpg


Seeing that, I hope the Gripen deal does go through in Quebec, they could use some more industry to wean off the equalization cash.

That chart also makes me want to see the shipbuilding program doubled or even tripled to give the Maritimers a boost as well.
 
Quebec has a lot of issues, poor administrative state and an older population. They also have a larger administrative state because they want to regulate their own things, which just adds costs, a good reminder for Alberta.

They have far more doctors in the private stream, but they also have far more regulation and lower pay for almost all specialties. There's very little incentive for out of province medical students to stay for more paperwork and lower pay. It's not necessarily true that if Alberta does this, they'll be like Quebec, because our admin is inherently less cumbersome and pay is better.

I do think some form of private care needs to happen, without it, we cannot possibly fund care sufficiently. If someone pays to get ahead, that may be "unfair" but it shortens the waitlist for those still on it. The most important thing with privatization, which increases dollars going into the demand side, is to pair it with supply side reforms. If we simply privatize the healthcare, more dollars are still competing for the same insufficient pool of providers. What needs to happen is private dollars to increase supply, and those dollars flow to increased physicians, whether that's attracting outside physicians or increase internal training capacity.
An example is if we need to do more MRIs, we now allow private funding. The private clinic, pays to buy the machine and hires technicians trained in the US, charges patient a fee because so they can recoup those costs, that would increase healthcare supply in AB. But if they simply bid up the wages of the existing pool of technicians, those private dollars just increased profit margin without an increase in healthcare capacity.
 

Back
Top