News   Apr 03, 2020
 6.4K     1 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 7.9K     4 
News   Apr 02, 2020
 4.7K     0 

Calgary & Alberta Economy

does not make Europe an attractive market
It's the fact that they are not our customer. Whether they're stagnant or growing, they're not stagnating using our resources as much as they could. The supplier they currently use isn't the kind of supplier you want to do business with.
 
Last edited:
...
Carney did call Canada the “most European of non-European nations".

Besides irritants like supply management standing in the way of expanded trade deals, what constrains trade other than Europe having stagnant population and economic growth? Being stylish and progressive does not make Europe an attractive market
A bunch of non tariff barriers. Easiest example one would be we build cars to North American standards and don't allow imports of European standard cars without localization.

'We' could shift, and it might make more sense to send Canadian made Lexus's to Europe (it appears there is no current Lexus manufacturing in Europe), rather than trying to send Canadian vehicles to the USA.
 
Easiest example one would be we build cars to North American standards and don't allow imports of European standard cars
Accepting European standards on a lot of things would be a good first step in opening ourselves up to more trade with the EU. It probably wouldn't change much on the car front as a lot of European brands are under larger umbrella brands that already operate here so it isn't likely they add competition for themselves in Canada.

We got fat, happy, and lazy using our proximity to the US. A slip in our standard of living and we're waking up to why having a strong economy matters. You cannot support our standard of living without one. I use to not care about the economy because things were good for me, what did I care that the GDP wasn't going up. Skip ahead if you don't want to ready me digressing about my Canadian Capitalism epiphany...

I had a good job, a house, and car. Except, that individualistic thinking eventually catches up to you and the bill for your standard of living comes due. In the form of deteriorating public services. I've realized our standard of living in Canada costs money, public money. We are not the USA, the invisible hand doesn't work here like it does there. We accept higher taxes for public services rather than relying on a higher wage and more purchasing power making up for what we'd lose in public services. The problem is, if our wages are not growing and our economy is not generating more money that is taxed to support our public services, those public services slip (like they have, directly affecting our standard of living). In a sense, it is Canadian to do more with less, what I mean is being smarter and working hard to do the same amount of work as our contemporaries. When I was in the military we had one person doing the job of three American military personnel. Using the mentality that it is the people who figure out how to work simply in the present, rather than the people who mastered complexity of the past, who get to say what happens in the future. We need to be better at working simply in our *new* present.

Unfortunately, our Grand Bargain means making some deals with the devil, everyone else is taking care of themselves, we cannot sideline ourselves by being too virtuous. We should be trading as much as we can with the US, China, India, and others. I think you also have more power to be virtuous when you're working with the devil because at least you have something to bargain with.
 
Last edited:
I'm supportive of the high level goals, it's just the chosen technology seems like a has been.. Plus if I'm not mistaken it generates more waste than the candu reactors, giving Canada yet another problem to solve.

IMO the time and money being slated for the so-called SMR would be better spent developing a naval reactor, that could not only be used for the next gen of RCN warships, but would also be small and portable enough to be used to support industry and communities in remote locations where grid extensions aren't practical.



What eastern exports would Canada need containers for though? Energy, sure I get that, but oil and gas don't go into cans, those are for finished products (and stolen cars)

Much like Canada, Africa is a resource colony. I don't see enormous amounts of trade happening there anytime soon.

Europe is well on its way to being de-industrialized, so no idea what they'd do with raw materials either.

It really does seem the Laurentians are stuck in a 20th century groundhog day, where the RCN will be hunting zee uboats for all eternity, and that Europe still has any political or economic relevance.

Time to get with the times Ottawa...
Admittedly not that familiar with SMRs, and that announcement was panned in Ontario as those projects are essentially underway with nothing really needed from the Federal Gov anyways.

Regarding export, Europe may have its problems, but to essentially right off a continent of 450 million people is a bit ridiculous. They may grow slowly but people there still need to consume products, good, etc. Eastern ports also access the middle east.
 
with nothing really needed from the Federal Gov anyways.
Nuclear is mostly regulated by the feds, and providing a better mandate for the different stage gates to look for solutions and avoid anything that looks like a regulatory induced schedule slip is a thing versus the prioritize risk above all else.
 

Back
Top