Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Calendar
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
News
Apr 03, 2020
Pastel Morning
4.7K
1
News
Apr 02, 2020
A Message to Our Readers
6.6K
3
News
Apr 02, 2020
Soon to be Gone
3.8K
0
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
darwink's latest activity
darwink
replied to the thread
Calgary Transit
.
While a net positive to be sure I wouldn’t count on big gains. More like a few LRVs not a couple new LRT stations. I’d prefer they be...
Yesterday at 11:15 PM
darwink
reacted to
jianxia15's post
in the thread
Infill Development Discussion
with
Like
.
Pretty solid infill in bankview. All six units sold for over 700k each.
Yesterday at 4:12 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
The capital and labour allocation will be different, as it will change how much profit may be available per a given project. Instead of...
Yesterday at 2:32 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
This answer was not the whole truth. The city has money in hand today (1/4 of the total), and it wouldn't be clawed back. It is unlikely...
Yesterday at 1:20 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
Long post (sorry), and my conclusion is yes. From the City: In the contribution agreement, it includes: ... ... ... ... ...
Yesterday at 1:19 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Roads, Highways & Infrastructure
.
Provisioning for pipelines and electricity at 1980s standards made the width make sense.
Yesterday at 11:02 AM
darwink
reacted to
Mountain Man's post
in the thread
Calgary Event Centre | 36.85m | 11s | CSEC | HOK
with
Like
.
Hate the deal, but might as well get on with it...
Yesterday at 11:01 AM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
There are active proposals on that stretch. It is a lot cheaper to build wood based walk ups. The land is cheaper. The structure is...
Wednesday at 8:09 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
Depends what you think of as significant. It certainly cannot hurt. And has helped where it has been implemented.
Wednesday at 7:50 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
Seems to have been very enforceable in parts of Elbow Park and Mount Royal, in cases I have knowledge of.
Wednesday at 2:50 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
I think for some questions they can be good, when there is a discreet project that there is a true binary. Like "put in place this tax...
Wednesday at 2:45 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
Not exactly. Requires a court process with low odds of success on the developer's part. Depends on how it was written of course. Not all...
Wednesday at 2:33 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
I would say people aren't entirely knowledgeable about the power of restrictive covenants. Even owner groups I've engaged with (Mount...
Wednesday at 2:32 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
I would say that a lot of people when asked to make a binary choice will make the status quo choice, as contextualizing the entire...
Wednesday at 12:12 PM
darwink
replied to the thread
Urban Development and Proposals Discussion
.
Plebiscites aren't great. This argument is bogus. People would vote for no carbon taxes, yet would vote for strict environmental...
Wednesday at 11:35 AM
Members
Back
Top