Macleod and 78 Ave SE. Another used car lot (and Tandy leather) bites the dust.
To be replaced with DP2025-00776, Bluebird Self Storage:
To be replaced with DP2025-00776, Bluebird Self Storage:
Macleod and 78 Ave SE. Another used car lot (and Tandy leather) bites the dust.
View attachment 667718
To be replaced with DP2025-00776, Bluebird Self Storage:
View attachment 667719
Anyone have an image of the old, old one? I moved into the area in 2006 and I remember it being at 33 Ave and 20 St. It was painted blue and covered 4 sides of the intersection. Then a car hit it and they made a one-sided black one and installed it closer to Crowchild.Here's the old one for comparison - same problems.
That would be a great spot for a monument, the art at the building on the corner of 34 and 20 is a better nob to the neighbourhoods past as an end of the line community of a street car.at 33 Ave and 20 St.
Renderings of Marc and Mada show a giant “M” & a film reel (presumably a nod to the old theatre) in the plaza at this corner.That would be a great spot for a monument, the art at the building on the corner of 34 and 20 is a better nob to the neighbourhoods past as an end of the line community of a street car.
To be fair, they did return the “lollipop” signs at 33 Ave & 19 St and 34 Ave & 20 St:The premise of signs like this is kind of flawed from the beginning.
It stems from a clumsy interpretations of an idea everyone always says in public engagement that sounds something like "Marda Loop is unique and unique places need clear boundaries. People should know they are there when they are there!
Most obvious way to do this - put up a giant sign. It's not subtle but checks the box.
Problem is that the act of putting up a sign like this is often counter to the very area it's announcing. Welcome to a walkable urban community via and oversized highway sign installation on an offramp! It's out of scale, it's painfully car-oriented. It's awkward also because it's only one sign - it's implying that only main "gateway" Marda Loop is EB 33rd to Crowchild. A neighbourhood has many gateways and entrances, elevating the trashiest entrances that has the least in common with what the neighbourhood actually is is a common mistake in car-oriented planning.
Here's the old one for comparison - same problems.
View attachment 667716
Does a sign like that break the bank? Not really - a few hundred grand on signs like this in a $50M project isn't really much cost savings. It's also clearly a demand from public engagement, so that's worth something. I don't see the value though IMO.
IMO a less obvious "gateway" feature would be more meaningful - such as grand sidewalks and planters to resolve how bad it is to cross Crowchild into Marda Loop on foot. A gateway that actually improves access rather than just symbolizes access to a destination, kind of thing. Probably would have cost more than the sign though!
Yeah totally - I just don't buy it when plans call out things like "gateway features" being worth highlighting. It's mostly a bit too vaguely "urban designy" for me, and doesn't get at what is the whole point of a "gateway" is.And the design does call for “Marda Loop Gateway Features” in the east end 33 Ave & 14 St, 34 Ave & 14 St (future phase), as well as at a couple other locations throughout the Main Streets. Who knows what those “features” will look like.
That said, I also don’t really like the new sign. It’s a bit cartoony for my taste, but maybe it’ll grow on me. I think they could have done something more subtle.
I found images of the old sign on the BIA website.Anyone have an image of the old, old one? I moved into the area in 2006 and I remember it being at 33 Ave and 20 St. It was painted blue and covered 4 sides of the intersection. Then a car hit it and they made a one-sided black one and installed it closer to Crowchild.
I found a Herald article that says it was there from 1989 to 2006, but Google Street View only seems to have images from late 2007, when temporary lights were put up after the accident.