1875
Senior Member
when i posted that 2nd pic in november someone mentioned there is no permits on it so guess that leave parking lot at least for now.
I think it's preferable to an abandoned 2-storey building attracting squatters lighting fires.good, we need more parking lots in downtown
storeys.com
"We're excited to share the potential for a residential tower on-site, leveraging the existing foundation originally designed for a 64-story structure in 1981," the company said. "If developed, this project could further enhance the property's position as a dynamic, mixed-use destination, integrating living, working, and retail spaces in Calgary's downtown."![]()
Armco Buys First Canadian Centre In Calgary For $46.5M, Planning Second Tower
The First Canadian Centre sits at 350 7 Ave SW in Calgary and was acquired by G2S2 Capital Inc. through Armco Capital Inc.storeys.com
I saw this article about First Canadian Centre on Reddit.
Fun fact: there was originally 2 towers proposed, but only the one was built. Armco seems to be interested in building a mixed-use/residential tower on the lot that was originally for the second tower.
Anyone has any thoughts on this?
storeys.com
Currently salivating at the thought of a 70 storey tower clad in the same granite![]()
This part jumped out to me:![]()
Armco Buys First Canadian Centre In Calgary For $46.5M, Planning Second Tower
The First Canadian Centre sits at 350 7 Ave SW in Calgary and was acquired by G2S2 Capital Inc. through Armco Capital Inc.storeys.com
I saw this article about First Canadian Centre on Reddit.
Fun fact: there was originally 2 towers proposed, but only the one was built. Armco seems to be interested in building a mixed-use/residential tower on the lot that was originally for the second tower.
Anyone has any thoughts on this?
The floor plate for the unbuilt tower is pretty small I believe, unless the plan is to rip out the entire foundation and start over again (not the impression I get from the article). If elevated rail does happen, I wonder if they might contemplate something like Bronconnier's new tower by Sunalta station with the first few floors being taken up by parkade?Not my thought, but someone must be thinking: If the Green Line goes by this, elevated, the property value will nose dive again, but then they can sue the city so no issue there.
70 seems crazy but maybe if it has a small floor plate it can go higher.
I don't understand a world where having a rapid transit line next door to your downtown building diminishes property value. Telus Sky must be really suffering.Not my thought, but someone must be thinking: If the Green Line goes by this, elevated, the property value will nose dive again, but then they can sue the city so no issue there.
70 seems crazy but maybe if it has a small floor plate it can go higher.
Since it would likely be at 4/5 story level, I wonder - again referring to Telus Sky - if the first few floors could be CRU's/office floors as a buffer.The floor plate for the unbuilt tower is pretty small I believe, unless the plan is to rip out the entire foundation and start over again (not the impression I get from the article). If elevated rail does happen, I wonder if they might contemplate something like Bronconnier's new tower by Sunalta station with the first few floors being taken up by parkade?




